Predictors of permanent pacemaker insertion after mitral valve replacement: A systematic review
- PMID: 35304920
- DOI: 10.1111/pace.14484
Predictors of permanent pacemaker insertion after mitral valve replacement: A systematic review
Abstract
As the established surgical mitral valve replacement (MVR) expands toward various contemporary techniques and access routes, the predictors and burden of procedure-related complications including the need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation need to be identified. Digital databases were searched systematically to identify studies reporting the incidence of PPM implantation after MVR. Detailed study and patient-level baseline characteristics including the type of study, sample size, follow-up, number of post-MVR PPM implantations, age, gender, and baseline ECG abnormalities were abstracted. A total of 12 studies, recruiting 37,124 patients were included in the final analysis. Overall, 2820 (7.6%) patients required a PPM with the net rate ranging from 1.7% to 10.96%. Post-MVR atrioventricular (AV) block was the most commonly observed indication for PPM, followed by sinoatrial (SA) node dysfunction, and bradycardia. Age, male gender, pre-existing comorbid conditions, prior CABG, history of arrhythmias or using antiarrhythmic drugs, atrial fibrillation ablation, and double valve replacement were predictors of PPM implantation post-MVR. Age, male gender, comorbid conditions like diabetes and renal impairment, prior CABG, double valve replacement, and antiarrhythmic drugs served as positive predictors of PPM implantation in patients undergoing MVR.
Keywords: atrioventricular block; cardiac surgery; conduction disturbances; mitral valve disease.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Similar articles
-
Permanent pacemaker implantation following mitral valve surgery. State-of-the-art scoping review.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Jul 1;67(7):ezaf210. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaf210. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025. PMID: 40569191 Free PMC article.
-
Anatomical and Functional Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 20;14(10):e039020. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039020. Epub 2025 May 15. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025. PMID: 40371597 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence and Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Two-centre experience from Oman.Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2025 May 2;25(1):209-217. doi: 10.18295/2075-0528.2831. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2025. PMID: 40641692 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors for the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Card Surg. 2022 Feb;37(2):377-405. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16129. Epub 2021 Nov 14. J Card Surg. 2022. PMID: 34775652
-
Need for a permanent pacemaker after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Spain: a retrospective analysis of the national Minimum Basic Dataset from 2017 to 2022.Open Heart. 2025 Jun 18;12(1):e003396. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2025-003396. Open Heart. 2025. PMID: 40533260 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Pacemaker implantation after concomitant tricuspid valve repair in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: Results from the Mini-Mitral International Registry.JTCVS Open. 2023 Nov 19;17:64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.10.036. eCollection 2024 Feb. JTCVS Open. 2023. PMID: 38420545 Free PMC article.
-
Permanent pacemaker implantation following mitral valve surgery. State-of-the-art scoping review.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Jul 1;67(7):ezaf210. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaf210. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025. PMID: 40569191 Free PMC article.
-
Sinus node dysfunction and related permanent pacemaker implantation after major cardiac surgeries, systematic review, and meta-analysis.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 10;10:1091312. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1091312. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 36970337 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Conservative Management of Left Atrial Dissection and Associated Complete Heart Block Following Cardiac Surgery.JACC Case Rep. 2025 Jun 4;30(13):103557. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2025.103557. Epub 2025 Mar 17. JACC Case Rep. 2025. PMID: 40480762 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Wang Z, Zhou C, Gu H, Zheng Z, Hu S. Mitral valve repair versus replacement in patients with rheumatic heart disease. J Heart Valve Dis. 2013;22(3):333-339.
-
- Fukuda T, Hawley RL, Edwards JE. Lesions of conduction tissue complicating aortic valvular replacement. Chest. 1976;69(5):605-614. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.69.5.605
-
- Malik AA, Malik J. Finders keepers: a case of the rogue pacing wire. Cureus. 2020;12(8):e9823. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9823
-
- Bogachev-Prokophiev AV, Afanasyev AV, Zheleznev SI, Nazarov VM, Sharifulin RM, Karaskov AM. Mid-term results of mitral valve repair using flexible bands versus complete rings in patients with degenerative mitral valve disease: a prospective, randomized study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;12(1):113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-017-0679-0
-
- Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2008;117(21):e350-408. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCUALTIONAHA.108.189742
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials