Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;45(5):681-687.
doi: 10.1111/pace.14484. Epub 2022 Apr 9.

Predictors of permanent pacemaker insertion after mitral valve replacement: A systematic review

Affiliations

Predictors of permanent pacemaker insertion after mitral valve replacement: A systematic review

Hamza Ghauri et al. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 May.

Abstract

As the established surgical mitral valve replacement (MVR) expands toward various contemporary techniques and access routes, the predictors and burden of procedure-related complications including the need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation need to be identified. Digital databases were searched systematically to identify studies reporting the incidence of PPM implantation after MVR. Detailed study and patient-level baseline characteristics including the type of study, sample size, follow-up, number of post-MVR PPM implantations, age, gender, and baseline ECG abnormalities were abstracted. A total of 12 studies, recruiting 37,124 patients were included in the final analysis. Overall, 2820 (7.6%) patients required a PPM with the net rate ranging from 1.7% to 10.96%. Post-MVR atrioventricular (AV) block was the most commonly observed indication for PPM, followed by sinoatrial (SA) node dysfunction, and bradycardia. Age, male gender, pre-existing comorbid conditions, prior CABG, history of arrhythmias or using antiarrhythmic drugs, atrial fibrillation ablation, and double valve replacement were predictors of PPM implantation post-MVR. Age, male gender, comorbid conditions like diabetes and renal impairment, prior CABG, double valve replacement, and antiarrhythmic drugs served as positive predictors of PPM implantation in patients undergoing MVR.

Keywords: atrioventricular block; cardiac surgery; conduction disturbances; mitral valve disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Wang Z, Zhou C, Gu H, Zheng Z, Hu S. Mitral valve repair versus replacement in patients with rheumatic heart disease. J Heart Valve Dis. 2013;22(3):333-339.
    1. Fukuda T, Hawley RL, Edwards JE. Lesions of conduction tissue complicating aortic valvular replacement. Chest. 1976;69(5):605-614. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.69.5.605
    1. Malik AA, Malik J. Finders keepers: a case of the rogue pacing wire. Cureus. 2020;12(8):e9823. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9823
    1. Bogachev-Prokophiev AV, Afanasyev AV, Zheleznev SI, Nazarov VM, Sharifulin RM, Karaskov AM. Mid-term results of mitral valve repair using flexible bands versus complete rings in patients with degenerative mitral valve disease: a prospective, randomized study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;12(1):113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-017-0679-0
    1. Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2008;117(21):e350-408. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCUALTIONAHA.108.189742

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances