Stimulating peristalsis improves esophagogastric junction observation during sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy in children and adolescents
- PMID: 35304989
- DOI: 10.51821/85.1.9240
Stimulating peristalsis improves esophagogastric junction observation during sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy in children and adolescents
Abstract
Background and study aims: Sedation impairs full visualization of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) and Z line (the squamocolumnar junction) during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The aim of this study was to determine whether induction of esophageal peristalsis could improve the ability to evaluate the Z line in children and adolescents.
Patients and methods: Study 1: Consecutive patients (10-15 years) undergoing EGD with propofol or midazolam sedation were enrolled. The proportion of Z line observed was compared between the two groups. Study 2: The effect of an air infusion near the EGJ following deflation of the stomach to induce esophageal peristalsis was investigated in the patients (15-18 years), undergoing EGD with propofol sedation. The proportion of Z line observed was compared between the stimulated group and control group.
Results: Study 1: 149 patients were evaluated; 87 received propofol (43 boys; average age 13.2 years (range, 10-15)) and 62 received midazolam (30 boys; average age 12.8 years (range, 10-15)). The proportion of the Z line visualized was low but was greater with propofol vs. midazolam sedation (36.8% vs 16.1%, P=0.0059). Study 2: 102 patients were evaluated; 62 had induction of peristalsis (34 boys; average age 16.2 years (range, 15-18)) and 40 controls (20 boys; average age 16.8 years (range, 15-18)). Complete visualization of the Z line achieved in 95% (59 of 62) following induction of peristalsis vs. 37.5% (15 of 40) of controls (P>0.001).
Conclusions: Induction of esophageal peristalsis greatly improved visualization of the Z line during sedated EGD in children and adolescents.
Keywords: Z line; children and adolescents; esophagogastric junction; esophagogastroduodenoscopy; peristalsis; sedation.
© Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest
Similar articles
-
Negative impact of sedation on esophagogastric junction evaluation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 May 14;20(18):5527-32. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5527. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 24833883 Free PMC article.
-
Improvement of atropine on esophagogastric junction observation during sedative esophagogastroduodenoscopy.PLoS One. 2017 Jun 27;12(6):e0179490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179490. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28654639 Free PMC article.
-
Propofol versus midazolam plus meperidine for sedation during ambulatory esophagogastroduodenoscopy.J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2003 Aug;37(2):146-9. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200308000-00012. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2003. PMID: 12883300
-
Effects of Sedation Performed by an Anesthesiologist on Pediatric Endoscopy: a Single-Center Retrospective Study in Korea.J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Jun 1;35(21):e183. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e183. J Korean Med Sci. 2020. PMID: 32476304 Free PMC article.
-
Bispectral index as a guide for titration of propofol during procedural sedation among children.Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):1666-74. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1979. Pediatrics. 2005. PMID: 15930231 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of propofol-based sedation and midazolam sedation in pediatric bidirectional endoscopy conducted by pediatric gastroenterologists.DEN Open. 2024 Jun 14;5(1):e391. doi: 10.1002/deo2.391. eCollection 2025 Apr. DEN Open. 2024. PMID: 38881579 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources