Distal Biliary Stent Migration in Patients with Irretrievable Bile Duct Stones: Long-Term Comparison Between Straight and Double-Pigtail Stents
- PMID: 35305168
- DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07461-4
Distal Biliary Stent Migration in Patients with Irretrievable Bile Duct Stones: Long-Term Comparison Between Straight and Double-Pigtail Stents
Abstract
Background: Prolonged biliary stenting may be considered in high-risk patients with irretrievable bile duct stones (IBDS). Distal stent migration (DSM) is a known complication, although data beyond the recommended interval of temporary stenting (3-6 months) are lacking. We compared the long-term incidence of DSM between straight and double-pigtail stents in patients with IBDS.
Methods: Consecutive patients with IBDS undergoing plastic biliary stenting (1/2009-12/2019) were retrospectively reviewed. DSM was confirmed on follow-up examination when the stent was no longer present at the papillary orifice nor fluoroscopically visible in the bile duct. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to determine estimates and predictors of DSM.
Results: Overall, 618 biliary stenting procedures (410 patients) were included: 289 with a straight stent (group A) and 329 with a double-pigtail (group B). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the DSM rates were 8.4 and 14.6% at 6 months, 21.4 and 27.7% at 12 months, 27 and 43.5% at 18 months, and 37.2 and 60.4% at 24 months, for groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.004). Double-pigtail stents were at higher risk for DSM (HR = 7.38, p = 0.04), whereas an inverse correlation was noted with age (HR = 0.97, p = 0.0001). Considering only temporary stenting procedures (≤ 6 months; n = 297), the probability of DSM was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.07).
Conclusions: In a setting of prolonged stenting for IBDS, the probability of DSM appears to be higher when a double-pigtail stent is used and in younger patients. A relative anti-migratory advantage of double-pigtail over straight stents appears negligible in this study.
Keywords: Bile duct stones; Biliary stenting; Distal stent migration; Double-pigtail stents; Straight stents.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Comment in
-
Risk of Stent Migration in Intended Long-Term Biliary Plastic Stents: Is Being Straight Good?Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Sep;67(9):4330-4331. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07465-0. Epub 2022 Mar 22. Dig Dis Sci. 2022. PMID: 35318551 No abstract available.
References
-
- Binmoeller KF, Schafer TW. Endoscopic management of bile duct stones. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;32:106–118 (Epub 02/24/2001). - DOI
-
- Vitale GC, Larson GM, Wieman TJ, Cheadle WG, Miller FB. The use of ERCP in the management of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1993;7:9–11 (Epub 01/01/1993). - DOI
-
- Sivak MV Jr. Endoscopic management of bile duct stones. Am J Surg. 1989;158:228–240 (Epub 09/01/1989). - DOI
-
- Vaira D, D’Anna L, Ainley C, Dowsett J, Williams S, Baillie J et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy in 1000 consecutive patients. Lancet. 1989;2:431–434 (Epub 08/19/1989). - DOI
-
- McHenry L, Lehman G. Difficult bile duct stones. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2006;9:123–132 (Epub 03/17/2006). - DOI