Obstetric analgesia. Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations
- PMID: 3530583
- DOI: 10.2165/00003088-198611040-00002
Obstetric analgesia. Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations
Abstract
All drugs used in obstetric analgesia are more or less lipophilic, their site of action is in the central nervous system, and they have good membrane penetrability in the fetomaternal unit. Thus the dose and method of administration as well as the duration of treatment are important clinical determinants of drug effects in the fetus and newborn. In the past, too much emphasis has been placed on fetomaternal blood concentration ratios of different agents; it is now appreciated that the extent of fetal tissue distribution and the neonatal elimination rate are pharmacokinetically much more important. Extensive fetal tissue distribution is reflected in a low fetomaternal drug concentration ratio, which may be followed by prolonged neonatal elimination of the drug. Currently, the most effective and safest method for obstetric analgesia is regional epidural administration of bupivacaine or lignocaine (lidocaine); only low doses are needed and the newborn is able to handle these agents efficiently. On the basis of pharmacokinetic and neurobehavioural assessments, inhalational anaesthetic agents appear to be more attractive than pethidine (meperidine) or benzodiazepines. Intermittent administration and fast pulmonary elimination of inhalational agents ensure that long-lasting residual effects are unlikely to occur. The kinetics of epidural and intrathecal opiates explain the problems associated with their use in obstetrics. Among the newer drugs used in obstetric analgesia, the properties of meptazinol and isoflurane appear interesting and these agents warrant further study. All drugs used in obstetric analgesia have a potentially detrimental effect on the neonate and, therefore, knowledge of fetal and neonatal pharmacokinetics is of importance to the clinician.
Similar articles
-
Pharmacokinetic optimisation of general anaesthesia in pregnancy.Clin Pharmacokinet. 1993 Jul;25(1):59-70. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199325010-00004. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1993. PMID: 8354017 Review.
-
Obstetric analgesia: pharmacokinetics and its relation to neonatal behavioral and adaptive functions.Biol Res Pregnancy Perinatol. 1984;5(1):23-35. Biol Res Pregnancy Perinatol. 1984. PMID: 6142732 Review.
-
Elimination of pethidine and bupivacaine in the newborn.Arch Dis Child. 1977 Aug;52(8):638-41. doi: 10.1136/adc.52.8.638. Arch Dis Child. 1977. PMID: 921310 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of epidural analgesia upon fetal and neonatal status.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974 Aug 15;119(8):ll01-6. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974. PMID: 4847437 No abstract available.
-
Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labor--comparison of sufentanil vs tramadol.Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Feb;19(1):87-96. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2007. PMID: 17511185 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
The transfer of ketorolac tromethamine from maternal to foetal blood.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1988;34(5):509-11. doi: 10.1007/BF01046711. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1988. PMID: 3264528 Clinical Trial.
-
Early respiratory depression during caesarean section following epidural meperidine.Can J Anaesth. 1992 Jan;39(1):71-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03008677. Can J Anaesth. 1992. PMID: 1733538
-
Clinical pharmacokinetics of ketorolac tromethamine.Clin Pharmacokinet. 1992 Dec;23(6):415-27. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199223060-00003. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1992. PMID: 1458761 Review.
-
Risk-benefit assessment of anaesthetic agents in the puerperium.Drug Saf. 1991 Jul-Aug;6(4):285-301. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199106040-00006. Drug Saf. 1991. PMID: 1888444 Review.
-
Pharmacokinetic optimisation of general anaesthesia in pregnancy.Clin Pharmacokinet. 1993 Jul;25(1):59-70. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199325010-00004. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1993. PMID: 8354017 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous