Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Apr 11;15(7):770-779.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.01.012. Epub 2022 Mar 16.

Treatment of Coronary De Novo Lesions by a Sirolimus- or Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Treatment of Coronary De Novo Lesions by a Sirolimus- or Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon

Wan Azman Wan Ahmad et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. .
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate a novel sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) compared with the best investigated paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB).

Background: There is increasing clinical evidence for the treatment of coronary de novo disease using drug-coated balloons. However, it is unclear whether paclitaxel remains the drug of choice or if sirolimus is an alternative, in analogy to drug-eluting stents.

Methods: Seventy patients with coronary de novo lesions were enrolled in a randomized, multicenter trial to compare a novel SCB (SeQuent SCB, B. Braun Melsungen; 4 μg/mm2) with a PCB (SeQuent Please, B. Braun Melsungen; 3 μg/mm2). The primary endpoint was angiographic late lumen loss (LLL) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events and individual clinical endpoints such as cardiac death, target lesion myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and binary restenosis.

Results: Quantitative coronary angiography revealed no differences in baseline parameters. After 6 months, in-segment LLL was 0.01 ± 0.33 mm in the PCB group versus 0.10 ± 0.32 mm in the SCB group. The mean difference between SCB and PCB was 0.08 (95% CI: -0.07 to 0.24). Noninferiority at a predefined margin of 0.35 was shown. However, negative LLL was more frequent in the PCB group (60% of lesions vs 32% in the SCB group; P = 0.019). Major adverse cardiovascular events up to 12 months also did not differ between the groups.

Conclusions: This first-in-human comparison of a novel SCB with a crystalline coating showed similar angiographic outcomes in the treatment of coronary de novo disease compared with a clinically proven PCB. However, late luminal enlargement was more frequently observed after PCB treatment. (Treatment of Coronary De-Novo Stenosis by a Sirolimus Coated Balloon or a Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheter Malaysia [SCBDNMAL]; NCT04017364).

Keywords: coronary de novo lesions; paclitaxel-coated balloon; sirolimus-coated balloon.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Scheller is a shareholder in InnoRa. Dr Schwenke is consultant to InnoRa on a honorary basis. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Comment in

  • Sirolimus Versus Paclitaxel: Second Round.
    Sabaté M. Sabaté M. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Apr 11;15(7):780-782. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.02.007. Epub 2022 Mar 16. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022. PMID: 35305907 No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data