Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec;306(6):1901-1911.
doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06511-6. Epub 2022 Mar 20.

Which type of chromosomal mosaicism is compatible for embryo transfer: a systematical review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Which type of chromosomal mosaicism is compatible for embryo transfer: a systematical review and meta-analysis

Yuanlin Ma et al. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Chromosomal mosaicism becomes a common phenomenon in Preimplantaion genetic testing (PGT). This meta-analysis was conducted to study which feature of chromosomal mosaicism was compatible for embryo transfer.

Methods: After searching the database PubMed, Embase, CCTR and related reviews up until May 2021. Two reviewers extracted relevant information and assessed study quality by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale independently. Summary Odd Radios (OR) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models for clinical outcomes. A network meta-analysis compared the clinical outcomes of different chromosomes.

Results: A total of six studies with 1,106 cycles of single mosaic embryo transferred were included. Significant results of implantation rate (IR), miscarriage rate (MR), and ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate (OP/LBR) were observed when comparing embryos with mosaicism level < 50% and ≥ 50% [OR 1.42, 95% CI (1.06, 1.89); OR 0.45, 95% CI (0.27, 0.75); OR 1.74, 95% CI (1.28, 2.37)], and embryos with mosaicism with only affecting segmental chromosome(s) and only involving whole chromosome(s) [OR 1.31, 95% CI (1.01, 1.71); OR 0.57, 95% CI (0.36, 0.93); OR 1.51, 95% CI (1.15, 2.00)]. Embryos with only mosaic gains or losses had significant higher IR and OP/LBR than complex mosaicism [Gains vs complex: OR 1.75, 95% CI (1.20, 2.54); OR 1.73, 95% CI (1.16, 2.58). Losses vs complex: OR 1.90, 95% CI (1.34, 2.71); OR 2.10, 95% CI (1.44, 3.07)]. Mosaic embryos with only one chromosome involved had significant favorable outcomes of IR and OP/LBR than with three or more chromosomes involved [OR 1.76, 95% CI (1.23, 2.52); OR 1.86, 95% CI (1.25,2.78)]. Chr. 7, Chr. 2, Chr. 1, Chr. 18, Chr. 11, Chr. X, Chr. 13, Chr. 14, Chr. 12, and Chr. 9 were considered as prioritized chromosomes of mosaic embryos for transfer.

Conclusions: This analysis support the embryos with mosaicism level ≥ 50%, whole chromosome(s) involved, multiple mosaic abnormalities were associated with worse pregnancy outcomes. Mosaicism level of 50% could be used as a threshold to assess the mosaic embryos.

Keywords: Chromosomal mosaicism; Clinical outcomes; In vitro fertilization; Neonatal outcomes; Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Munne S, Weier HU, Grifo J, Cohen J (1994) Chromosome mosaicism in human embryos. Biol Reprod 51:373–379. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201909-1836OC - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taylor TH, Gitlin SA, Patrick JL, Crain JL, Wilson JM, Griffin DK (2014) The origin, mechanisms, incidence and clinical consequences of chromosomal mosaicism in humans. Hum Reprod Update 20:571–581. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmu016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Practice C, Genetic Counseling Professional Group of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address aao. Clinical management of mosaic results from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) of blastocysts: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2020;114:246–54. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.05.014 .
    1. Lin PY, Lee CI, Cheng EH et al (2020) Clinical outcomes of single mosaic embryo transfer: high-level or low-level mosaic embryo, does it matter? J Clin Med 9(6):1695. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061695 - DOI - PMC
    1. Natsuaki MN, Dimler LM (2018) Pregnancy and child developmental outcomes after preimplantation genetic screening: a meta-analytic and systematic review. World J Pediatr 14(6):555–569 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources