Self-reported impact of developmental stuttering across the lifespan
- PMID: 35307825
- DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.15211
Self-reported impact of developmental stuttering across the lifespan
Abstract
Aim: To examine the phenomenology of stuttering across the lifespan in the largest prospective cohort to date.
Method: Participants aged 7 years and older with a history of developmental stuttering were recruited. Self-reported phenotypic data were collected online including stuttering symptomatology, co-occurring phenotypes, genetic predisposition, factors associated with stuttering severity, and impact on anxiety, education, and employment.
Results: A total of 987 participants (852 adults: 590 males, 262 females, mean age 49 years [SD = 17 years 10 months; range = 18-93 years] and 135 children: 97 males, 38 females, mean age 11 years 4 months [SD = 3 years; range = 7-17 years]) were recruited. Stuttering onset occurred at age 3 to 6 years in 64.0%. Blocking (73.2%) was the most frequent phenotype; 75.9% had sought stuttering therapy and 15.5% identified as having recovered. Half (49.9%) reported a family history. There was a significant negative correlation with age for both stuttering frequency and severity in adults. Most were anxious due to stuttering (90.4%) and perceived stuttering as a barrier to education and employment outcomes (80.7%).
Interpretation: The frequent persistence of stuttering and the high proportion with a family history suggest that stuttering is a complex trait that does not often resolve, even with therapy. These data provide new insights into the phenotype and prognosis of stuttering, information that is critically needed to encourage the development of more effective speech therapies.
What this paper adds: Half of the study cohort had a family history of stuttering. While 75.9% of participants had sought stuttering therapy, only 15.5% identified as having recovered. There was a significant negative correlation between age and stuttering frequency and severity in adults.
© 2022 Mac Keith Press.
Comment in
-
The importance of understanding the broader experience of stuttering.Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022 Oct;64(10):1188-1189. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15347. Epub 2022 Jul 21. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022. PMID: 35864600 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Gerlach H, Totty E, Subramanian A, et al. Stuttering and labor market outcomes in the United States. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2018; 61: 1649-1663.
-
- Smith KA, Iverach L, O'Brian S, et al. Anxiety in 11-year-old children who stutter: Findings from a prospective longitudinal community sample. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2017; 60: 1211-1222.
-
- Teesson K, Packman A and Onslow M. The Lidcombe Behavioral Data Language of stuttering: research note. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research 2003; 46: 1009-1015. Journal Article. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/078).
-
- Reilly S, Onslow M, Packman A, et al. Natural history of stuttering to 4 years of age: a prospective community-based study. Pediatrics 2013; 132: 460-467.
-
- Yairi E and Ambrose N. Epidemiology of stuttering: 21st century advances. Journal of Fluency Disorders 2013; 38: 66-87. Article. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.11.002.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical