Different patterns of sensory nerve involvement in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy subtypes
- PMID: 35307862
- DOI: 10.1002/mus.27530
Different patterns of sensory nerve involvement in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy subtypes
Abstract
Introduction/aims: Among subtypes of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), different immune pathophysiologies have been proposed. In this study, sensory nerve conduction studies were compared among clinical subtypes to attempt to better understand the underlying pathophysiology.
Methods: A total of 138 patients with CIDP was classified into clinical subtypes: typical CIDP (N = 68), multifocal CIDP (N = 27), or other (N = 2). Patients with immunoglobulin M (IgM) neuropathy anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein neuropathy (MAG; N = 19) were also included as disease controls. Sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) were recorded in the median, ulnar, and superficial radial and sural nerves.
Results: SNAP amplitudes (P < .05) and conduction velocities (P < .01) in the median nerve and conduction velocities (P < .05) in the ulnar nerve were lower in typical CIDP than in multifocal CIDP, whereas those in the radial and sural nerves were comparable in each group. Low median and normal sural SNAP amplitudes were more common in typical CIDP (P < .005) than in multifocal CIDP, suggesting predominant involvement at terminal portions of the nerves.
Discussion: Terminal portions of sensory nerves are preferentially affected in typical CIDP compared with multifocal CIDP. These findings might be partially explained by the hypothesis of antibody-mediated demyelination in typical CIDP at the regions where the blood-nerve barrier is anatomically deficient, whereas multifocal CIDP predominantly affects the nerve trunks, largely due to cell-mediated demyelination, with disruption of the blood-nerve barrier.
Keywords: blood-nerve barrier; chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy; clinical subtypes; nerve conduction study; sensory nerve action potential.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Comment in
-
Electrophysiology to identify disease mechanisms in CIDP: Reliability and value.Muscle Nerve. 2022 Aug;66(2):113-115. doi: 10.1002/mus.27640. Epub 2022 Jun 2. Muscle Nerve. 2022. PMID: 35596645 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Van den Bergh PYK, van Doorn PA, Hadden RDM, et al. European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: report of a joint Task Force - second revision. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2021;26:242-268.
-
- Kuwabara S, Isose S, Mori M, et al. Different electrophysiological profiles and treatment response in ‘typical’ and ‘atypical’ chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015;86(10):1054-1059.
-
- Kuwabara S, Misawa S, Mori M, Tamura N, Kubota M, Hattori T. Long term prognosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: a five year follow up of 38 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77(1):66-70.
-
- Shibuya K, Sugiyama A, Ito S, et al. Reconstruction magnetic resonance neurography in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Ann Neurol. 2015;77(2):333-337.
-
- Shibuya K, Tsuneyama A, Misawa S, et al. Different distribution of demyelination in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy subtypes. J Neuroimmunol. 2020;341:577170.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials