Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 15;35(1):102-110.
doi: 10.2337/ds21-0034. Epub 2022 Feb 8.

Partner Involvement in Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management: A Mixed-Methods Investigation

Affiliations

Partner Involvement in Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management: A Mixed-Methods Investigation

Vicki S Helgeson et al. Diabetes Spectr. .

Abstract

Researchers have recognized the role of social environment in diabetes management, with substantial attention directed toward spouses or romantic partners of people with diabetes. However, the specific ways in which partners are involved have not been articulated. This study, which included 207 couples in which one person was recently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, used a mixed-methods approach to assess types of partner involvement in diabetes management. First, different types of partner involvement were qualitatively identified from audio-recorded interviews, and links between qualitative findings and demographics were examined. Next, qualitative codes were compared with quantitative measures of partner involvement. Finally, relations of qualitative codes to relationship quality and diabetes outcomes were assessed. Qualitative analyses identified three ways in which partners were involved in diabetes management (support provision, collaboration, and controlling behavior) and two ways in which they were not involved (independent coping and disengagement on the part of the person with diabetes). Participants with diabetes perceived less partner involvement than their partners. Comparisons with quantitative measures revealed that collaboration was distinct from partner support. Reports from participants with diabetes of collaboration, but not partner support, were connected to higher relationship quality and lower A1C, whereas partner reports of collaboration were related to better self-care. Diabetes disengagement was associated with poorer relationship and behavioral outcomes. These findings underscore the varied ways in which partners are and are not involved in diabetes management and suggest that collaboration is more beneficial than social support in terms of relationship quality and diabetes outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gallant MP. The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: a review and directions for research. Health Educ Behav 2003;30:170–195 - PubMed
    1. Wiebe DJ, Helgeson V, Berg CA. The social context of managing diabetes across the life span. Am Psychol 2016;71:526–538 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Helgeson VS, Mascatelli K, Seltman H, Korytkowski M, Hausmann LRM. Implications of supportive and unsupportive behavior for couples with newly diagnosed diabetes. Health Psychol 2016;35:1047–1058 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mayberry LS, Berg CA, Greevy RA Jr, Wallston KA. Assessing helpful and harmful family and friend involvement in adults’ type 2 diabetes self-management. Patient Educ Couns 2019;102:1380–1388 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Helgeson VS, Jakubiak B, Van Vleet M, Zajdel M. Communal coping and adjustment to chronic illness: theory update and evidence. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2018;22:170–195 - PMC - PubMed