Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 3:13:788473.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.788473. eCollection 2022.

The Eccentric Phase in Unilateral Resistance Training Enhances and Preserves the Contralateral Knee Extensors Strength Gains After Detraining in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations

The Eccentric Phase in Unilateral Resistance Training Enhances and Preserves the Contralateral Knee Extensors Strength Gains After Detraining in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Giuseppe Coratella et al. Front Physiol. .

Abstract

The current randomized controlled study investigated whether or not the inclusion of the eccentric phase in resistance training favors the contralateral strength gains after different unilateral protocols, and whether such gains are retained after detraining. Sixty healthy women were randomly assigned to a unilateral concentric-only (CONC), eccentric-only (ECC), concentric-eccentric (TRAD) volume-equated knee extension training or control group (CON). The participants trained 2 days/week for 8 weeks and then did not train for further 8 weeks. Knee extensors isokinetic concentric, eccentric, and isometric peak torque and vastus lateralis muscle thickness were assessed in the contralateral limb at baseline, post-training, and post-detraining. At post-training, concentric peak torque increased in CONC [+9.2%, 95%CI (+6.2/+12.3), p < 0.001, ES: 0.70, 95%CI (0.01/1.39)], ECC [+11.0% (+7.7/+14.2), p < 0.001: ES: 0.66(0.09/1.23)] and TRAD [+8.5%(+5.7/+11.6), p < 0.001, ES: 0.50(0.02/0.98)]. Eccentric peak torque increased in ECC in ECC [+15.0%(+11.4/+20.7), p < 0.001, ES: 0.91(0.14/1.63)] and TRAD [+5.5%(+0.3/10.7), p = 0.013, ES: 0.50(0.05/0.95)]. Isometric peak torque increased in ECC [+11.3(+5.8/16.8), p < 0.001, ES: 0.52(0.10/0.94)] and TRAD [+8.6%(+3.4/+13.7), p < 0.001, ES: 0.55(0.14/0.96)]. No change in eccentric and isometric peak torque occurred in CONC (p > 0.05). Muscle thickness did not change in any group (p > 0.05). At post-detraining, all groups preserved the contralateral strength gains observed at post-training (p < 0.05). The findings showed that ECC and TRAD increased contralateral knee extensors strength in concentric, eccentric, and isometric modality, while CONC only increased concentric strength. The eccentric phase appears to amplify the cross-education effect, permitting a transfer in strength gaining toward multiple testing modalities. Both eccentric-based and traditional eccentric-concentric resistance protocols are recommended to increase the contralateral retention in strength gains after a detraining period.

Keywords: concentric; cross-education effect; isokinetic; quadriceps; strength training; ultrasound; vastus lateralis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The changes in contralateral concentric, eccentric, and isometric peak torque are shown for the concentric-only (CONC), eccentric-only (ECC), traditional concentric–eccentric (TRAD) volume-equated training groups and control (CON). Concentric peak torque similarly increased in all training groups more than CON and was similarly retained after the detraining period. Eccentric peak torque increased and was retained similarly in ECC and TRAD more than CON, but only ECC was different from CONC. Isometric peak torque increased similarly in ECC and TRAD more than CON, but TRAD did not differ from CON at post-detraining. *p < 0.05 vs. Pre; ap < 0.05 vs. CON; and bp < 0.05 vs. CONC.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adrushko J. W., Lanovaz J. L., Björkman K. M., Kontulainen S. A., Farthing J. P. (2018). Unilateral strength training leads to muscle-specific sparing effects during opposite homologous limb immobilization. J. Appl. Physiol. 124, 866–876. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00971.2017, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bosquet L., Berryman N., Dupuy O., Mekary S., Arvisais D., Bherer L., et al. . (2013). Effect of training cessation on muscular performance: a meta-analysis. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 23, e140–e149. doi: 10.1111/sms.12047, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carroll T. J., Herbert R. D., Munn J., Lee M., Gandevia S. C. (2006). Contralateral effects of unilateral strength training: evidence and possible mechanisms. J. Appl. Physiol. 101, 1514–1522. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00531.2006, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chaouachi A., Ben Othman A., Makhlouf I., Young J. D., Granacher U., Behm D. G. (2019). Global training effects of trained and untrained muscles with youth can be maintained during 4 weeks of detraining. J. Strength Cond. Res. 33, 2788–2800. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002606, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cirer-Sastre R., Beltrán-Garrido J. V., Corbi F. (2017). Contralateral effects after unilateral strength training: a meta-analysis comparing training loads. J. Sports Sci. Med. 16, 180–186. - PMC - PubMed