Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;9(4):372-383.
doi: 10.1037/cpp0000373. Epub 2020 Dec 3.

Fertility Discussions: Perspectives of Adolescents and Young Adults With Differences of Sex Development

Jaclyn L Papadakis  1 , Jonathan L Poquiz  2 , Cindy L Buchanan  3 , Yee-Ming Chan  4 , Canice E Crerand  5 , Jennifer Hansen-Moore  5 , Hillary M Kapa  6 , Leena Nahata  5 , Keeley J Pratt  7 , Amy C Tishelman  4 , Diane Chen  1
Affiliations

Fertility Discussions: Perspectives of Adolescents and Young Adults With Differences of Sex Development

Jaclyn L Papadakis et al. Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: Fertility-related health care and decision-making needs for youth with differences of sex development (DSD) are complex and vary by condition and the values and preferences of each individual and their partner and/or family. Discussing fertility implications can be a challenging aspect of clinician and family communication about a DSD diagnosis. This qualitative study assesses fertility-related communication experiences of adolescents and young adults (AYA) with DSD.

Method: Participants included 97 AYA with DSD ages 12-26 years (M = 18.5, SD = 3.9) who completed questionnaires on demographic and medical information and patient-clinician communication. A subsample of 33 AYA also completed semistructured interviews about experiences with fertility discussions.

Results: Two major themes, each with subthemes, were identified: (1) understanding of fertility related to (1a) one's own fertility status, (1b) reproductive and parenting options, and (1c) emotional reactions to one's own fertility status and (2) conversations about fertility related to (2a) reflections on conversations, (2b) barriers, and (2c) advice.

Conclusions: AYA perspectives in this study provide important information about how youth with DSD learn about their fertility status, the impact their fertility status has on them, and the fertility-related conversations they have with their providers and families. Specific recommendations for providers and parents or caregivers include the following: inform youth of their fertility status as early as possible; be direct but patient in delivering information; begin by giving basic information and provide more detail as the conversation unfolds; revisit the conversation over time to allow for further discussion or information-seeking; offer additional information or resources, including behavioral health resources.

Keywords: AYA; DSD; fertility counseling; intersex conditions; qualitative.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Armuand GM, Wettergren L, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, & Lampic C (2014). Desire for children, difficulties achieving a pregnancy, and infertility distress 3 to 7 years after cancer diagnosis. Supportive Care in Cancer, 22, 2805–2812. 10.1007/s00520-014-2279-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campo-Engelstein L, Chen D, Baratz AB, Johnson EK, & Finlayson C (2017). The ethics of fertility preservation for pediatric patients with differences (disorders) of sex development. Journal of the Endocrine Society, 1, 638–645. 10.1210/js.2017-00110 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dworkin SL (2012). Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1319–1320. 10.1007/s10508-012-0016-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Finlayson C, Johnson EK, Chen D, Dabrowski E, Gosiengfiao Y, Campo-Engelstein L, … Woodruff TK (2016). Proceedings of the working group session on fertility preservation for individuals with gender and sex diversity. Transgender Health, 1, 99–107. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guest G, MacQueen KM, & Namey EE (2012). Applied thematic analysis. 10.4135/9781483384436 - DOI