Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 14:15:733-743.
doi: 10.2147/JPR.S349101. eCollection 2022.

60-Day PNS Treatment May Improve Identification of Delayed Responders and Delayed Non-Responders to Neurostimulation for Pain Relief

Ramana Naidu  1 , Sean Li  2 , Mehul J Desai  3   4 , Samir Sheth  5 , Nathan D Crosby  6 , Joseph W Boggs  6
Affiliations

60-Day PNS Treatment May Improve Identification of Delayed Responders and Delayed Non-Responders to Neurostimulation for Pain Relief

Ramana Naidu et al. J Pain Res. .

Abstract

Objective: Conventional neurostimulation typically involves a brief (eg, ≤10-day) trial to assess presumed effectiveness prior to permanent implantation. Low trial conversion rates and high explant rates due to inadequate pain relief highlight the need for improved patient identification strategies. The development of a 60-day percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) system enables evaluation of outcomes following an extended temporary treatment period of up to 60 days, that may obviate or validate the need for permanent implant. The present study provides the first real-world evidence regarding patient response throughout a 60-day PNS treatment period.

Methods: Anonymized data listings were compiled from patients who underwent implantation of temporary percutaneous leads and opted-in to provide real-world data to the device manufacturer during routine interactions with device representatives throughout the 60-day treatment.

Results: Overall, 30% (222/747) of patients were early responders (≥50% pain relief throughout treatment). Another 31% (231/747) of patients initially presented as non-responders but surpassed 50% pain relief by the end of treatment. Conversely, 32% (239/747) of patients were non-responders throughout treatment. An additional 7% (55/747) of patients initially presented as responders but fell below 50% relief by the end of the treatment period.

Conclusion: An extended, 60-day PNS treatment may help identify delayed responders, providing the opportunity for sustained relief and improving access to effective PNS treatment. Compared to a conventionally short trial of ≤10 days, a longer 60-day PNS treatment may also help reduce explant rates by identifying delayed non-responders unlikely to benefit long-term. These scenarios support the importance of an extended 60-day temporary PNS stimulation period to help inform stepwise treatment strategies that may optimize outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Keywords: 60-day PNS; chronic pain; neuromodulation; peripheral nerve stimulation; real-world evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

R Naidu: research funding from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Nalu, Omnia Medical, and Vivex; consultant for Abbott, Avanos, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, CereVu, DoctorPlan, Exer AI, KarunaLabs, Medtronic, Nalu Medical, Omnia Medical, PainTEQ, SPR Therapeutics, and Vivex. S Li: research funding from Abbott, Avanos, Averitas Pharma, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Nalu Medical, Nevro, PainTeq, Saluda Medical, SGX Medical, SPR Therapeutics; consultant for Avanos, Averitas Pharm, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Nalu Medical, Nevro, PainTeq, Saluda Medical, Scilex Pharma, SPR Therapeutic, and Vertos; stock ownership/options in Nalu Medical, and National Spine and Pain Centers. MJ Desai: research funding from Abbott, Amgen, Bioness, Mainstay, Nalu, Nature Cell, Nevro, Seikagaku, SPR Therapeutics, and Vivex; consultant for Abbott, Avanos and Relievant; Stock ownership/options in SPR Therapeutics, SynerFuse, and Virdio. S Sheth: consultant for Nevro, Medtronic, Boston Scientific; speaker’s bureau for Medtronic; physician advisory board for Medtronic, Boston Scientific. ND Crosby: employee of SPR Therapeutics; stock ownership/options in SPR Therapeutics. JW Boggs: employee of SPR Therapeutics; stock ownership/options in SPR Therapeutics. He also has multiple patents owned by and issued to SPR Therapeutics. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Analysis flow diagram. Anonymized patient records consisting of reports of percent pain relief throughout the 60-day treatment period were assessed for inclusion in the analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Changes in mean percent pain relief during treatment. Mean percent pain relief at the first report and the end of the 60-day treatment are shown for each response profile.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean percent pain relief by week and response profile. Mean percent pain relief is summarized by week throughout the 60-day PNS treatment period for each response profile. Reports of percent pain relief were binned by week based on the time of their collection relative to the time of lead implantation (ie, start of treatment). Week 8+ includes reports from Day 57 to Day 60.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Henschke N, Kamper SJ, Maher SG. The epidemiology and economic consequences of pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(1):139–147. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.09.010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kuehn B. Chronic pain prevalence. JAMA. 2018;320(16):1632. - PubMed
    1. Pitcher MH, Von Korff M, Bushnell MC, et al. Prevalence and profile of high-impact chronic pain in the United States. J Pain. 2019;20(2):146–160. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2018.07.006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dahlhamer J, Lucas J, Zelaya C, et al. Prevalence of chronic pain and high-impact chronic pain among adults - United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(36):1001–1006. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6736a2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gore M, Brandenburg NA, Dukes E, et al. Pain severity in diabetic peripheral neuropathy is associated with patient functioning, symptom levels of anxiety and depression, and sleep. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005;30(4):374–385. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.04.009 - DOI - PubMed