Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;28(4):349-360.
doi: 10.1007/s00761-022-01120-z. Epub 2022 Mar 15.

[Management of infections in patients with cancer]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[Management of infections in patients with cancer]

[Article in German]
Annika Yanina Classen et al. Onkologe (Berl). 2022.

Abstract

Patients with cancer are at increased risk of infection due to disease-associated or therapy-induced immunosuppression. Taking into account globally increasing antimicrobial resistance rates and negative effects associated with antibiotic treatments, the effective, appropriate and guideline-conform use of anti-infectives must be promoted in this clinical setting. The application of antibacterial prophylaxis should be limited to high-risk patients. Infection diagnostics and therapeutic strategies differ depending on the extent of expected immunosuppression and the patient's individual risk factors.

Hämatologische und onkologische Patienten haben aufgrund der durch die Grunderkrankung bestehenden oder therapieassoziierten Immunsuppression oftmals ein deutlich erhöhtes Infektionsrisiko. Unter Berücksichtigung weltweit zunehmender antimikrobieller Resistenzen und negativer mit der Antibiotikatherapie assoziierter Effekte sollte der angemessene und leitliniengerechte Einsatz von Antiinfektiva auch in diesem Bereich gefördert werden. Die Indikation zur antibakteriellen Prophylaxe sollte streng gestellt werden. Die Infektionsdiagnostik sowie das therapeutische Management unterscheiden sich je nach Ausmaß der erwarteten Immunsuppression und nach vorliegenden patientenindividuellen Risikofaktoren.

Keywords: Antibiotic prophylaxis; Antibiotic stewardship; Drug resistance, microbial; Immunosuppression; Infections/risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Schuts EC, Hulscher M, Mouton JW, et al. Current evidence on hospital antimicrobial stewardship objectives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(7):847–856. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00065-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davey P, Marwick CA, Scott CL, et al. Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4.. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Molina J, Noguer M, Lepe JA, et al. Clinical impact of an educational antimicrobial stewardship program associated with infectious diseases consultation targeting patients with cancer: Results of a 9-year quasi-experimental study with an interrupted time-series analysis. J Infect. 2019;79(3):206–211. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2019.07.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baur D, Gladstone BP, Burkert F, et al. Effect of antibiotic stewardship on the incidence of infection and colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria and Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30325-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Willmann M, Vehreschild M, Biehl LM, et al. Distinct impact of antibiotics on the gut microbiome and resistome: a longitudinal multicenter cohort study. BMC Biol. 2019;17(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12915-019-0692-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources