Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr;27(2):273-279.
doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02596-9. Epub 2022 Mar 21.

BMI: does it predict the need for component separation?

Affiliations

BMI: does it predict the need for component separation?

J R Smith et al. Hernia. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: Patient optimization and selecting the proper technique to repair large incisional hernias is a multifaceted challenge. Body mass index (BMI) is a modifiable variable that may infer higher intra-abdominal pressures and, thus, predict the need for component separation (CS) at the time of surgery, but no data exist to support this. This paper assesses if the ratio of anterior-posterior (AP): transverse (TRSV) abdominal diameter, from pre-operative CT imaging, indicates a larger proportion of intra-abdominal fat and correlates with a hernia defect requiring a component separation for successful tension-free closure.

Methods: Ninety patients were identified who underwent either an open hernia repair with mesh by primary closure (N = 53) or who required a component separation at the time of surgery (N = 37). Pre-operative CT images were used to measure hernia defect width, AP abdominal diameter, and TRSV abdominal diameter. Quantitative data, nominal data, and logistic regression was used to determine predictors associated with surgical group categorization.

Results: The average hernia defect widths for primary closure and CS were 7.7 ± 3.6 cm (mean ± SD) and 9.8 ± 4.5, respectively (p = 0.015). The average BMI for primary closure was 33.9 ± 7.2 and 33.8 ± 4.9 for those requiring CS (p = 0.924). The AP:TRSV diameter ratios for primary closure and CS were 0.41 ± 0.08 and 0.49 ± 0.10, respectively (p < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis including both defect width and AP:TRSV diameter ratio, only AP:TRSV diameter ratio predicted the need for a CS (p = 0.001) while BMI did not (p = 0.92).

Conclusion: Intraabdominal fat distribution measured by AP:TRSV abdominal diameter ratio correlates with successful tension-free fascial closure during incisional hernia repair, while BMI does not.

Keywords: Abdominal wall reconstruction; BMI primary closure; Component separation; Computed tomography; Incisional hernia; Mesh; Pre-operative optimization; Ventral hernia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pauli EM, Rosen MJ (2013) Open ventral hernia repair with component separation. Surg Clin North Am. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2013.06.010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fligor JE, Lanier ST, Dumanian GA (2017) Current risk stratification systems are not generalizable across surgical technique in midline ventral hernia repair. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001206 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Dumanian G (2014) Abdominal wall reconstruction. In: Thorne CH, Chung KC, Gosaine AK et al (2013) Grabb and Smith’s plastic surgery, 7th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
    1. Franklin BR, Patel KM, Nahabedian MY, Baldassari LE, Cohen EI, Bhanot P (2013) Predicting abdominal closure after component separation for complex ventral hernias: maximizing the use of preoperative computed tomography. Ann Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182773915 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vorst AL (2015) Evolution and advances in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. World J Gastrointest Surg. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v7.i11.293 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources