Dental implant failure rates in patients with self-reported allergy to penicillin
- PMID: 35313065
- DOI: 10.1111/cid.13082
Dental implant failure rates in patients with self-reported allergy to penicillin
Abstract
Background: In a number of previous studies, patients with reported penicillin allergies have been documented to experience higher rates of dental implant failure than those who had not reported this allergy. The authors of this study aimed to determine whether an increased risk of implant failure is associated with patient-reported penicillin allergy and which antibiotic was administered.
Methods and materials: A retrospective study was conducted through chart review of patients who received dental implants at the New York University College of Dentistry. Participants were eligible if they received one or more dental implants at the College and provided at least 1 year of follow-up data.
Results: The overall implant failure rate was 12.9%. The failure rate in patients who reported no allergy to penicillin and took amoxicillin was 8.4%, while the failure rate in the allergy-reporting group was 17.1% (adjusted OR = 2.22, 95% CI = 1.44-3.44). The failure rate in allergy-reporting patients who took Clindamycin was also higher than in those who took amoxicillin (19.9%; adjusted OR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.77-4.47) or any antibiotic other than amoxicillin (20.9%; adjusted OR = 2.77, 95% CI = 1.77-4.32).
Conclusions: Significant findings included a lower implant failure rate in patients taking amoxicillin than in patients taking other antibiotics. There was a significant increase in early implant failure in allergy reporting patients.
Keywords: allergy; dental implant; penicillin.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Jung RE, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 6):2-21.
-
- Derks J, Håkansson J, Wennström JL, Tomasi C, Larsson M, Berglundh T. Effectiveness of implant therapy analyzed in a Swedish population: early and late implant loss. J Dent Res. 2015;94(3 Suppl):44S-51S.
-
- Renvert S, Persson GR, Pirih FQ, Camargo PM. Peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis: case definitions and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S304-S312.
-
- Buser D. Effects of various titanium surface configurations on osseointegration and clinical implant stability. In: Lang NP, Karing T, Lindhe J, eds. Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Periodontology. Quintessence Publishing Co., Ltd; 1999:88-101.
-
- Karoussis IK, Brägger U, Salvi GE, Burgin W, Lang NP. Effect of implant design on survival and success rates of titanium oral implants: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI dental implant system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:8-17.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
