Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review
- PMID: 35313430
- PMCID: PMC8973487
- DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_255_21
Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review
Abstract
Background: Currently, there is no consensus on patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study is a systematic review of previously published patient selection for ambulatory LC.
Methods: A comprehensive search was done in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Google Scholar Database up to March 2020 to summarise previously reported medical or surgical selection criteria used for inclusion and exclusion of patients, as well as successful same-day discharge rates and readmission rate after discharge.
Results: Fifty-nine studies with a total of 13,219 patients were included in this systematic review. In total, the median same-day discharge rate was 90% (range: 63%-99.4%), and median readmission rate was 2.22% (range: 0%-16.9%). The most considered medical criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I and II, age <70, and body mass index <35. Surgical criteria varied greatly. The top three accessible exclusion variables were (1) common bile duct stones, cholangitis, or jaundice (27 publications, 45.8%); (2) history of abdominal surgery (12 publications, 20.3%) and (3) history of pancreatitis (9 publications, 15.3%).
Conclusion: The results of the current study showed the variable patient selection in different centres, the medical aspect criteria may be expanded under adequate pre-anaesthetic assessment and preparation and the surgical aspect criteria should include more laboratory or imaging parameters to ensure the surgical safety.
Keywords: Ambulatory surgical procedures; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; systematic review.
Conflict of interest statement
None
Figures
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as day-surgery procedure: current indications and patients' selection.Int J Surg. 2008;6 Suppl 1:S86-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.12.032. Epub 2008 Dec 14. Int J Surg. 2008. PMID: 19167938 Review.
-
Comparison of one stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intra-operative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus two-stage pre-operative endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of pre-operatively diagnosed patients with common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):770-778. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5739-y. Epub 2017 Jul 21. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 28733744
-
Influence of discharge timing and diagnosis on outcomes of pediatric laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surgery. 2017 Dec;162(6):1304-1313. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.07.029. Epub 2017 Oct 16. Surgery. 2017. PMID: 29050888
-
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3275-3286. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06613-w. Epub 2018 Dec 3. Surg Endosc. 2019. PMID: 30511313 Review.
-
Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 May;27(10):4656-4669. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202305_32477. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37259749
References
-
- Soper NJ, Stockmann PT, Dunnegan DL, Ashley SW. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.The new ‘gold standard’? Arch Surg. 1992;127:917–21. - PubMed
-
- Wakabayashi G, Iwashita Y, Hibi T, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, et al. Tokyo guidelines 2018: Surgical management of acute cholecystitis: Safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos) J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25:73–86. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources