Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr-Jun;18(2):176-180.
doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_255_21.

Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review

Weiwei Chen et al. J Minim Access Surg. 2022 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Background: Currently, there is no consensus on patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study is a systematic review of previously published patient selection for ambulatory LC.

Methods: A comprehensive search was done in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Google Scholar Database up to March 2020 to summarise previously reported medical or surgical selection criteria used for inclusion and exclusion of patients, as well as successful same-day discharge rates and readmission rate after discharge.

Results: Fifty-nine studies with a total of 13,219 patients were included in this systematic review. In total, the median same-day discharge rate was 90% (range: 63%-99.4%), and median readmission rate was 2.22% (range: 0%-16.9%). The most considered medical criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I and II, age <70, and body mass index <35. Surgical criteria varied greatly. The top three accessible exclusion variables were (1) common bile duct stones, cholangitis, or jaundice (27 publications, 45.8%); (2) history of abdominal surgery (12 publications, 20.3%) and (3) history of pancreatitis (9 publications, 15.3%).

Conclusion: The results of the current study showed the variable patient selection in different centres, the medical aspect criteria may be expanded under adequate pre-anaesthetic assessment and preparation and the surgical aspect criteria should include more laboratory or imaging parameters to ensure the surgical safety.

Keywords: Ambulatory surgical procedures; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram for literature inclusion
Figure 2
Figure 2
Geographical (a) and temporal distributions (b) of included publications
Figure 3
Figure 3
American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification (a), age upper limit (b), and Body mass index (c) cut-off values used in previous publications

Similar articles

References

    1. Stinton LM, Shaffer EA. Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: Cholelithiasis and cancer. Gut Liver. 2012;6:172–87. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reynolds W., Jr The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS. 2001;5:89–94. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schirmer BD, Edge SB, Dix J, Hyser MJ, Hanks JB, Jones RS. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Ann Surg. 1991;213:665–76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Soper NJ, Stockmann PT, Dunnegan DL, Ashley SW. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.The new ‘gold standard’? Arch Surg. 1992;127:917–21. - PubMed
    1. Wakabayashi G, Iwashita Y, Hibi T, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, et al. Tokyo guidelines 2018: Surgical management of acute cholecystitis: Safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos) J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25:73–86. - PubMed