Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 20;60(4):e0218821.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.02188-21. Epub 2022 Mar 22.

Development and Validation of a Novel Anaerobic Carbapenem Inactivation Method (Ana-CIM) for the Detection of Carbapenemase Production in Bacteroides fragilis

Affiliations

Development and Validation of a Novel Anaerobic Carbapenem Inactivation Method (Ana-CIM) for the Detection of Carbapenemase Production in Bacteroides fragilis

Allison R Eberly et al. J Clin Microbiol. .

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance, particularly to carbapenems, is of increasing concern in Bacteroides fragilis. Carbapenem resistance in B. fragilis is most often mediated by the activation of chromosomally encoded metallo-β-lactamase cfiA by the presence of an upstream insertion sequence (IS). While traditional phenotypic susceptibility methods and molecular tests to detect carbapenem resistance in B. fragilis exist, they are not available in most clinical microbiology laboratory settings. Here, we describe the development of the anaerobic carbapenem inactivation method (Ana-CIM) for predicting carbapenemase production in B. fragilis based off the principles of the well-established modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) for Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We also present the clinical validation and reproducibility of the Ana-CIM at three clinical laboratory sites (with 60 clinical isolates, 45% ertapenem resistant). Compared to ertapenem susceptibility by Etest interpreted by CLSI M100 Ed30, the Ana-CIM accurately detected carbapenem resistance in B. fragilis with categorical agreement (CA) of 87% (52/60) and 0% (0/21) very major error (VME), 11% (4/36) major error (ME), and 7% (4/60) minor error (mE) rates across all sites. Additionally, the Ana-CIM demonstrated high reproducibility with 5 clinical and 3 quality control (QC) isolates tested in triplicate with 3 commercial Mueller-Hinton media across all sites, with 93% (604/648) of replicates within a 2-mm zone size of the mode for each isolate. We conclude that the Ana-CIM can be readily deployed in clinical laboratories at a low cost for detection of carbapenemase-mediated resistance in B. fragilis.

Keywords: Bacteroides fragilis; anaerobes; antimicrobial susceptibility testing; carbapenem resistance; carbapenemase production.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Overview of study workflow. After initial assay development at WU, a pilot study collection containing 20 isolates of B. fragilis from WU was tested by three clinical laboratories to evaluate the assay protocol. Quality control (QC) isolates were tested at all sites at least daily. Next, for the clinical validation study, 35 clinical isolates originating from all three sites were tested by the Ana-CIM at all sites. Finally, a reproducibility study was performed on a total of eight (five test and three QC) isolates. These eight isolates were tested in triplicate on three different days with three different media by all three sites for a total of 81 replicates per isolate. Abbreviations: Ana-CIM, anaerobic carbapenem inactivation method; MC, Mayo Clinic; NCH, Nationwide Children’s Hospital; QC, quality control; WU, Washington University School of Medicine.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Ana-CIM zone size reading guide. Representative carbapenemase positive (A, C, and D) and negative (B) clinical isolates are shown with confluent growth up to the disk (A) or microcolonies within the zone of inhibition (C and D). Consistent with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100 Ed30, colonies within the zone are read as growth (6 mm). Solid black lines represent measurement, and measured zone size is listed at the bottom of each panel in millimeters.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Ana-CIM zone size distribution of clinical isolates tested at all sites. Zone sizes for Ana-CIM testing for each clinical validation study isolate are shown. Results for Nationwide Children’s Hospital (NCH) (orange triangles), Mayo Clinic (MC) (green squares), and Washington University School of Medicine (WU) (blue circles) are shown. The isolates labeled in red along the x axis tested resistant by the ertapenem Etest, while the isolates in black tested susceptible. Lab-developed Ana-CIM interpretive criteria are shown as red solid lines, and CLSI mCIM interpretive criteria for Enterobacterales are shown in dashed gray lines.
FIG 4
FIG 4
Distribution of Ana-CIM zone sizes for reproducibility study isolates. Histograms include all 81 Ana-CIM zone-of-inhibition measurements for each of the 5 test isolates (A to E) and the quality control (QC) isolates (F to H) in the reproducibility study. Each isolate was tested in triplicate on 3 different commercially available Mueller-Hinton agar plates on 3 different days at the 3 clinical laboratories (27 zone measurements from each site for each of the isolates for a total of 81 replicates for each isolate).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nguyen MH, Yu VL, Morris AJ, McDermott L, Wagener MW, Harrell L, Snydman DR. 2000. Antimicrobial resistance and clinical outcome of Bacteroides bacteremia: findings of a multicenter prospective observational trial. Clin Infect Dis 30:870–876. 10.1086/313805. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boente RF, Ferreira LQ, Falcão LS, Miranda KR, Guimarães PL, Santos-Filho J, Vieira JM, Barroso DE, Emond JP, Ferreira EO, Paula GR, Domingues RM. 2010. Detection of resistance genes and susceptibility patterns in Bacteroides and Parabacteroides strains. Anaerobe 16:190–194. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.02.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Snydman DR, Jacobus NV, McDermott LA, Goldstein EJ, Harrell L, Jenkins SG, Newton D, Patel R, Hecht DW. 2017. Trends in antimicrobial resistance among Bacteroides species and Parabacteroides species in the United States from 2010–2012 with comparison to 2008–2009. Anaerobe 43:21–26. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.11.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Snydman DR, Jacobus NV, McDermott LA, Golan Y, Goldstein EJ, Harrell L, Jenkins S, Newton D, Pierson C, Rosenblatt J, Venezia R, Gorbach SL, Queenan AM, Hecht DW. 2011. Update on resistance of Bacteroides fragilis group and related species with special attention to carbapenems 2006–2009. Anaerobe 17:147–151. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.05.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hawser SP, Hackel M, Hoban DJ. 2010. Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of European Bacteroides fragilis with reduced carbapenem susceptibility. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:803–804. 10.1093/jac/dkq016. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources