Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 1;61(3):252-255.
doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000053. Epub 2022 Mar 21.

Effectiveness of the Glass Bead Sterilizer for Sterilizing Surgical Instruments

Affiliations

Effectiveness of the Glass Bead Sterilizer for Sterilizing Surgical Instruments

Beth Skiles et al. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. .

Abstract

Survival rodent surgery requires the use of sterile instruments for each animal, which can be challenging when performing multiple surgeries on batches of animals. Glass bead sterilizers (GBS) are widely considered to facilitate this practice by sterilizing the tips of the instruments between animals. However, other disciplines have raised questions about the efficacy of the GBS, especially when used with surgical tools that have grooves or ridges that may contain organic debris. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of the GBS to sterilize instruments commonly used in rodent surgery by intentionally contaminating a selection of instruments with a standardized bacterial broth inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. As expected, a simple ethanol wipe was ineffective in sterilizing instruments in all treatment groups. An ethanol wipe followed by GBS was effective in sterilizing 82.5% (99 of 120) of the instruments. Our study suggests that the GBS may not be effective for consistent sterilization of surgical instruments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Photograph of a hot bead sterilizer. Glass beads fill the well in the center and are heated temperature range between 450°F and 515°F. Manufacturer recommendations states that decontamination of tool tips requires 15 seconds contact time in beads.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Surgical instruments tested and their special characteristics.

Similar articles

References

    1. Animal Welfare Regulations.2013. 9 CFR § 3.129.
    1. Bausch SJ. 2011. The operating room and asepsis, p. 66–73. In: Tear M, editor. Small animal surgical nursing. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier Mosby.
    1. Bernal J, Baldwin M, Gleason T, Kuhlman S, Moore G, Talcott M. 2009. Guidelines for rodent survival surgery. J Invest Surg. 22:445–451. 10.3109/08941930903396412. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Corner GA. 1987. An assessment of the performance of a glass bead sterilizer. J Hosp Infect 10:308–311. 10.1016/0195-6701(87)90015-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Costa DM, Lopes LKO, Hu H, Tipple AFV, Vickery K. 2017. Alcohol fixation of bacteria to surgical instruments increases cleaning difficulty and may contribute to sterilization inefficacy. Am J Infect Control 45:e81–e86. 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.04.286. - DOI - PubMed