Guidelines and evidence-based recommendations in anaesthesia: where do we stand?
- PMID: 35314064
- PMCID: PMC8933135
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.02.025
Guidelines and evidence-based recommendations in anaesthesia: where do we stand?
Abstract
Clinical practice guidelines are increasingly important to guide clinical care. However, they can vary widely in quality, and many recommendations are based on low-level evidence. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for new flexible formats for rigorously developed guidelines. Future guideline development should be standardised, graded, registered, and updated to ensure that they are 'living' works in progress.
Keywords: AGREE II; GRADE; clinical practice guidelines; guideline quality; rapid statements; rigour.
Copyright © 2022 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Alonso P., Irfan A., Solà I., et al. The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:e58. - PubMed
-
- The Lancet Managing conflicts of interests in clinical guidelines. Lancet. 2019;394:710. - PubMed
-
- Mitchell P. Financial conflicts of interest and authorship of clinical practice guidelines—trust is fragile. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;4 - PubMed
-
- Institute of Medicine (US) National Academies Press; Washington, DC: 2011. Committee on standards for developing trustworthy clinical practice guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines we can Trust. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical