GP wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review
- PMID: 35314428
- PMCID: PMC8966782
- DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0680
GP wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: Doctors' organisations in the UK have reported worrying levels of work-related stress and burnout in the GP workforce for some time, and the COVID-19 pandemic has presented clear new challenges.
Aim: To synthesise international evidence exploring the impact of COVID-19 on primary care doctors' mental health and wellbeing, and identify risk factors associated with their psychological wellbeing during this time.
Design and setting: Mixed-methods systematic review.
Method: Six bibliographic databases, Google Scholar, and MedRxiv were searched on 19 November 2020 and 3 June 2021 to identify studies of GP psychological wellbeing during the pandemic. Reference checking was also conducted. Two reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and assessed the quality of studies using standardised tools. Heterogeneity in outcomes, setting, and design prohibited statistical pooling; studies were combined using a convergent integrated thematic synthesis.
Results: Thirty-one studies were included. Multiple sources of stress were identified including changed working practices; risk, exposure, and inadequate personal protective equipment (PPE); information overload; pandemic preparedness; and cohesion across sectors. Studies demonstrated an impact on psychological wellbeing, with some GPs experiencing stress, burnout, anxiety, depression, fear of COVID-19, lower job satisfaction, and physical symptoms. Studies reported gender and age differences: women GPs had poorer psychological outcomes across all domains, and older GPs reported greater stress and burnout. Use of outcome measures and reporting practice varied greatly.
Conclusion: This review of international evidence demonstrates that the COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected GPs' wellbeing around the world. Further research could explore gender and age differences, identifying interventions targeted to these groups.
Keywords: COVID-19; coronavirus; general practice; mental health; systematic review; wellbeing.
© The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared no competing interests.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Occupational burnout and job satisfaction among physicians in times of COVID-19 crisis: a convergent parallel mixed-method study.BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 28;21(1):811. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10897-4. BMC Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33906619 Free PMC article.
-
[Burnout, anxiety, insomnia and depressive symptoms among French outpatient physicians in the second wave of COVID-19: Comparison between general practitioners and specialists].Encephale. 2024 Apr;50(2):192-199. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2023.01.013. Epub 2023 Apr 6. Encephale. 2024. PMID: 37121809 Free PMC article. French.
-
Understanding why primary care doctors leave direct patient care: a systematic review of qualitative research.BMJ Open. 2020 May 12;10(5):e029846. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029846. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32404383 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of burnout and mental health problems among medical staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 20;13(7):e061945. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061945. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37474193 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Distress and Wellbeing among General Practitioners in 33 Countries during COVID-19: Results from the Cross-Sectional PRICOV-19 Study to Inform Health System Interventions.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 6;19(9):5675. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095675. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35565070 Free PMC article.
-
Future Health Today and patients at risk of undiagnosed cancer: a pragmatic cluster randomised trial of quality- improvement activities in general practice.Br J Gen Pract. 2025 May 2;75(754):e306-e315. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0491. Print 2025 May. Br J Gen Pract. 2025. PMID: 39567181 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Technostress, technosuffering, and relational strain: a multi-method qualitative study of how remote and digital work affects staff in UK general practice.Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Feb 27;75(752):e211-e221. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0322. Print 2025 Mar. Br J Gen Pract. 2025. PMID: 39778944 Free PMC article.
-
UK general practice service delivery research priorities: an adapted James Lind Alliance approach.Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Dec 28;74(738):e9-e16. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0226. Print 2024 Jan. Br J Gen Pract. 2023. PMID: 38154946 Free PMC article.
-
Communication training for general practitioners aimed at improving antibiotic prescribing: a controlled before-after study in multicultural Dutch cities.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 23;11:1279704. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1279704. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38323031 Free PMC article.
References
-
- The Lancet Physician burnout: a global crisis. Lancet. 2019;394(10193):93. - PubMed
-
- West CP, Tan AD, Habermann TM, et al. Association of resident fatigue and distress with perceived medical errors. JAMA. 2009;302(12):1294–1300. - PubMed
-
- Dawson J. Links between NHS staff experience and patient satisfaction: analysis of surveys from 2014 and 2015. 2018 https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/links-between-nhs-... (accessed 3 Mar 2022).
-
- West M, Markiewicz L. Effective team working in health care. In: Ferlie E, Montgomery K, Pedersen AR, editors. The Oxford handbook of health care management. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016. pp. 231–252.
-
- Beech J, Bottery S, Charlesworth A, et al. Introduction. Closing the gap: key areas for action on the health and care workforce. 2019 https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/2019-06/closing-the-gap... (accessed 11 Feb 2022).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical