Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;36(6):e14652.
doi: 10.1111/ctr.14652. Epub 2022 May 3.

Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on evaluation for heart transplantation at an urban academic medical center

Affiliations

Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on evaluation for heart transplantation at an urban academic medical center

Ersilia M DeFilippis et al. Clin Transplant. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: For patients with advanced heart failure, socioeconomic deprivation may impede referral for heart transplantation (HT). We examined the association of socioeconomic deprivation with listing among patients evaluated at our institution and compared this against the backdrop of our local community.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients evaluated for HT between January 2017 and December 2020. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were recorded. Block group-level area deprivation index (ADI) decile was obtained at each patient's home address and Socioeconomic Status (SES) index was determined by patient zip code.

Results: In total, 400 evaluations were initiated; one international patient was excluded. Among this population, 111 (27.8%) were women, 219 (54.9%) were White, 94 (23.6%) Black, and 59 (14.8%) Hispanic. 248 (62.2%) patients were listed for transplant. Listed patients had significantly higher SES index and lower ADI compared to those who were not listed. However, after adjustment for clinical factors, ADI and SESi were not predictive of listing. Similarly, patient sex, race, and insurance did not influence the likelihood of listing for HT. Notably, the distribution of the referral cohort based on ADI deciles was not reflective of our center's catchment area, indicating opportunities for improving access to transplant for disadvantaged populations.

Conclusions: Although socioeconomic deprivation did not predict listing in our analysis, we recognize the need for broader outreach to combat upstream bias that prevents patients from being referred for HT.

Keywords: disparities; health equity; heart failure; heart transplantation; socioeconomic status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Shirey TE, Hu Y, Ko YA, et al. Relation of neighborhood disadvantage to heart failure symptoms and hospitalizations. Am J Cardiol. 2021; 140: 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.10.057
    1. Tumin D, Foraker RE, Hayes D, Tobias JD. Community social deprivation and solid organ transplant outcomes. Am J Transplant. 2018; 18(6): 1572-1573. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14677
    1. Evans JDW, Kaptoge S, Caleyachetty R, et al. Socioeconomic deprivation and survival after heart transplantation in England: an analysis of the United Kingdom Transplant Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016; 9(6): 695-703. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002652
    1. Asderakis A, Khalid U, Madden S, Dayan C. The influence of socioeconomic deprivation on outcomes in pancreas transplantation in England: registry data analysis. Am J Transplant. 2018; 18(6): 1380-1387. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14633
    1. Kind AJH, Buckingham WR. Making neighborhood-disadvantage metrics accessible-the Neighborhood Atlas. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(26): 2456-2458. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1802313

LinkOut - more resources