Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun 2;31(2):453-469.
doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00112. Epub 2022 Mar 22.

Lipreading: A Review of Its Continuing Importance for Speech Recognition With an Acquired Hearing Loss and Possibilities for Effective Training

Affiliations
Review

Lipreading: A Review of Its Continuing Importance for Speech Recognition With an Acquired Hearing Loss and Possibilities for Effective Training

Lynne E Bernstein et al. Am J Audiol. .

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this review article is to reinvigorate interest in lipreading and lipreading training for adults with acquired hearing loss. Most adults benefit from being able to see the talker when speech is degraded; however, the effect size is related to their lipreading ability, which is typically poor in adults who have experienced normal hearing through most of their lives. Lipreading training has been viewed as a possible avenue for rehabilitation of adults with an acquired hearing loss, but most training approaches have not been particularly successful. Here, we describe lipreading and theoretically motivated approaches to its training, as well as examples of successful training paradigms. We discuss some extensions to auditory-only (AO) and audiovisual (AV) speech recognition.

Method: Visual speech perception and word recognition are described. Traditional and contemporary views of training and perceptual learning are outlined. We focus on the roles of external and internal feedback and the training task in perceptual learning, and we describe results of lipreading training experiments.

Results: Lipreading is commonly characterized as limited to viseme perception. However, evidence demonstrates subvisemic perception of visual phonetic information. Lipreading words also relies on lexical constraints, not unlike auditory spoken word recognition. Lipreading has been shown to be difficult to improve through training, but under specific feedback and task conditions, training can be successful, and learning can generalize to untrained materials, including AV sentence stimuli in noise. The results on lipreading have implications for AO and AV training and for use of acoustically processed speech in face-to-face communication.

Conclusion: Given its importance for speech recognition with a hearing loss, we suggest that the research and clinical communities integrate lipreading in their efforts to improve speech recognition in adults with acquired hearing loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahissar, M. , Nahum, M. , Nelken, I. , & Hochstein, S. (2009). Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364(1515), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0253 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akeroyd, M. A. (2008). Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults. International Journal of Audiology, 47(Suppl. 2), S53–S71. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020802301142 - PubMed
    1. Alexander, J. M. (2013). Individual variability in recognition of frequency-lowered speech. Seminars in Hearing, 34(3), 253–254. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1348021
    1. Alexander, J. M. (2016). 20Q: Frequency lowering ten years later - New technology innovations. AudiologyOnline, Article 18040.
    1. Alexander, J. M. , & Rallapalli, V. (2017). Acoustic and perceptual effects of amplitude and frequency compression on high-frequency speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(2), 908–923. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4997938 - PubMed