Captivity and Animal Microbiomes: Potential Roles of Microbiota for Influencing Animal Conservation
- PMID: 35316343
- DOI: 10.1007/s00248-022-01991-0
Captivity and Animal Microbiomes: Potential Roles of Microbiota for Influencing Animal Conservation
Abstract
During the ongoing biodiversity crisis, captive conservation and breeding programs offer a refuge for species to persist and provide source populations for reintroduction efforts. Unfortunately, captive animals are at a higher disease risk and reintroduction efforts remain largely unsuccessful. One potential factor in these outcomes is the host microbiota which includes a large diversity and abundance of bacteria, fungi, and viruses that play an essential role in host physiology. Relative to wild populations, the generalized pattern of gut and skin microbiomes in captivity are reduced alpha diversity and they exhibit a significant shift in community composition and/or structure which often correlates with various physiological maladies. Many conditions of captivity (antibiotic exposure, altered diet composition, homogenous environment, increased stress, and altered intraspecific interactions) likely lead to changes in the host-associated microbiome. To minimize the problems arising from captivity, efforts can be taken to manipulate microbial diversity and composition to be comparable with wild populations through methods such as increasing dietary diversity, exposure to natural environmental reservoirs, or probiotics. For individuals destined for reintroduction, these strategies can prime the microbiota to buffer against novel pathogens and changes in diet and improve reintroduction success. The microbiome is a critical component of animal physiology and its role in species conservation should be expanded and included in the repertoire of future management practices.
Keywords: Animal captivity; Conservation; Host microbiota; Microbiota engineering; Species reintroduction.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Gut Microbiomes of Endangered Przewalski's Horse Populations in Short- and Long-Term Captivity: Implication for Species Reintroduction Based on the Soft-Release Strategy.Front Microbiol. 2020 Mar 12;11:363. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00363. eCollection 2020. Front Microbiol. 2020. PMID: 32226419 Free PMC article.
-
Captivity Reduces Diversity and Shifts Composition of the Great Bustard (Otis tarda dybowskii) Microbiome.Ecol Evol. 2025 Jan 10;15(1):e70836. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70836. eCollection 2025 Jan. Ecol Evol. 2025. PMID: 39803193 Free PMC article.
-
Captivity-Induced Changes in the Skin Microbial Communities of Hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis).Microb Ecol. 2019 Apr;77(3):782-793. doi: 10.1007/s00248-018-1258-1. Epub 2018 Sep 12. Microb Ecol. 2019. PMID: 30209587
-
Reproductive Microbiomes in Wild Animal Species: A New Dimension in Conservation Biology.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1200:225-240. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-23633-5_8. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019. PMID: 31471799 Review.
-
Environmental factors and gut microbiota: Toward better conservation of deer species.Front Microbiol. 2023 Mar 7;14:1136413. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1136413. eCollection 2023. Front Microbiol. 2023. PMID: 36960286 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The impact of management on the fecal microbiome of endangered greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) in a zoo-based conservation program.Conserv Physiol. 2024 Aug 7;12(1):coae052. doi: 10.1093/conphys/coae052. eCollection 2024. Conserv Physiol. 2024. PMID: 39113731 Free PMC article.
-
Oral and fecal microbiome of confiscated Bengal slow lorises in response to confinement duration.Front Microbiol. 2022 Sep 27;13:941261. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.941261. eCollection 2022. Front Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 36238588 Free PMC article.
-
Updating conservation metagenomics on the gut microbiome of threatened mammals.iScience. 2025 Jun 25;28(7):113000. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113000. eCollection 2025 Jul 18. iScience. 2025. PMID: 40687781 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ontogeny drives shifts in skin bacterial communities in facultatively paedomorphic salamanders.Microbiology (Reading). 2023 Oct;169(10):001399. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001399. Microbiology (Reading). 2023. PMID: 37815535 Free PMC article.
-
Alteration of the gut microbial composition of critically endangered Malayan tigers (Panthera tigris jacksoni) in captivity during enrichment phase.Mol Biol Rep. 2024 Jun 14;51(1):742. doi: 10.1007/s11033-024-09642-y. Mol Biol Rep. 2024. PMID: 38874703
References
-
- IUCN (2021) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2021-1. https://www.iucnredlist.org
-
- Keulartz J (2015) Captivity for conservation? Zoos at a crossroads. J Agric Environ Ethics 28:335–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9537-z - DOI
-
- Bowkett AE (2009) Recent captive-breeding proposals and the return of the ark concept to global species conservation. Conserv Biol 23:773–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01157.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Harley D, Mawson PR, Olds L, McFadden M, Hogg C (2018) The contribution of captive breeding in zoos to the conservation of Australia’s threatened fauna. In: Garnett S, Woinarski J, Lindenmayer D, Latch P (eds) Recovering Australian Threatened Species: A Book of Hope. CSIRO Publishing, Australia, pp 281–294
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources