Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Apr;85(3):820-838.
doi: 10.1007/s00248-022-01991-0. Epub 2022 Mar 22.

Captivity and Animal Microbiomes: Potential Roles of Microbiota for Influencing Animal Conservation

Affiliations
Review

Captivity and Animal Microbiomes: Potential Roles of Microbiota for Influencing Animal Conservation

Jason W Dallas et al. Microb Ecol. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

During the ongoing biodiversity crisis, captive conservation and breeding programs offer a refuge for species to persist and provide source populations for reintroduction efforts. Unfortunately, captive animals are at a higher disease risk and reintroduction efforts remain largely unsuccessful. One potential factor in these outcomes is the host microbiota which includes a large diversity and abundance of bacteria, fungi, and viruses that play an essential role in host physiology. Relative to wild populations, the generalized pattern of gut and skin microbiomes in captivity are reduced alpha diversity and they exhibit a significant shift in community composition and/or structure which often correlates with various physiological maladies. Many conditions of captivity (antibiotic exposure, altered diet composition, homogenous environment, increased stress, and altered intraspecific interactions) likely lead to changes in the host-associated microbiome. To minimize the problems arising from captivity, efforts can be taken to manipulate microbial diversity and composition to be comparable with wild populations through methods such as increasing dietary diversity, exposure to natural environmental reservoirs, or probiotics. For individuals destined for reintroduction, these strategies can prime the microbiota to buffer against novel pathogens and changes in diet and improve reintroduction success. The microbiome is a critical component of animal physiology and its role in species conservation should be expanded and included in the repertoire of future management practices.

Keywords: Animal captivity; Conservation; Host microbiota; Microbiota engineering; Species reintroduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. IUCN (2021) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2021-1. https://www.iucnredlist.org
    1. Keulartz J (2015) Captivity for conservation? Zoos at a crossroads. J Agric Environ Ethics 28:335–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9537-z - DOI
    1. Bowkett AE (2009) Recent captive-breeding proposals and the return of the ark concept to global species conservation. Conserv Biol 23:773–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01157.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harley D, Mawson PR, Olds L, McFadden M, Hogg C (2018) The contribution of captive breeding in zoos to the conservation of Australia’s threatened fauna. In: Garnett S, Woinarski J, Lindenmayer D, Latch P (eds) Recovering Australian Threatened Species: A Book of Hope. CSIRO Publishing, Australia, pp 281–294
    1. Conde DA, Flesness N, Colchero F, Jones OR, Scheuerlein A (2011) An emerging role of zoos to conserve biodiversity. Science 331:1390–1391 - PubMed - DOI

LinkOut - more resources