Long-term results of robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting with composite arterial grafts for multiple coronary anastomoses: 10-year experience
- PMID: 35316487
- DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01391-z
Long-term results of robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting with composite arterial grafts for multiple coronary anastomoses: 10-year experience
Abstract
Currently, robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (RACABG) is a feasible choice for myocardial revascularization. Acceptable outcomes have been reported for RACABG with single target vessels; however, the long-term benefits of multivessel RACABG with composite arterial grafts have rarely been studied. Therefore, our study investigated the long-term results of multivessel RACABG with composite arterial grafts by reviewing the clinical data of patients from Taichung Veterans General Hospital. From December 2005 to June 2015, 562 patients underwent robotic-assisted robotic minimally invasive direct coronary bypass (MIDCAB) at Taichung Veterans General Hospital. Two major composite arterial graft configurations (i.e., inverted T-graft and Y-graft) were used. Data regarding the short-term and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted MIDCAB were obtained from the medical records. For data regarding long-term outcomes of the patients not followed up at our institution, telephone interviews were conducted in June 2019. The in-hospital mortality rate and complication rate were 2.5% and 17.6%, respectively. We completed the follow-up for 486 patients (86.4%), and postoperative coronary imaging-based evaluation performed for 157 patients. The 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 82.7% and 65.2%, respectively. The 5-year and 10-year major adverse cardiac and cerebral events-free survival rates were 86.9% and 70.9%, respectively. The 5-year patency rate of various coronary anastomoses was 85.1-100%. Our study revealed that multivessel robotic-assisted MIDCAB with composite arterial grafts provided acceptable long-term outcomes, irrespective of the composite graft configuration.
Keywords: CABG; Graft patency rates; Long-term results; Robotic-assisted MIDCAB; Survival; Total arterial revascularization.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Long-term angiographic follow-up of robotic-assisted coronary artery revascularization.Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 May;93(5):1426-31. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.11.031. Epub 2012 Feb 18. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012. PMID: 22342992
-
Robotic-assisted MIDCAB procedure through a minithoracotomy: Step-by-step instructions.Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Nov 4;2022. doi: 10.1510/mmcts.2022.045. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg. 2022. PMID: 36331815
-
Angiographic patency after robotic beating heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting facilitated by automated distal anastomotic connectors.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Oct 1;31(4):467-474. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa149. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020. PMID: 33091933
-
Graft Patency after Robotically Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.Innovations (Phila). 2019 Apr;14(2):117-123. doi: 10.1177/1556984519836896. Epub 2019 Mar 18. Innovations (Phila). 2019. PMID: 30885092 Review.
-
Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting: how I teach it.Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jul 31;13(4):346-353. doi: 10.21037/acs-2024-rcabg-0033. Epub 2024 Jul 29. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024. PMID: 39157180 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
How to advance from minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting to totally endoscopic coronary bypass grafting: challenges in Europe versus United States of America.Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Sep 29;13(5):397-408. doi: 10.21037/acs-2023-rcabg-0210. Epub 2024 Sep 23. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024. PMID: 39434975 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Robotic Assisted Minimally Invasive Coronary Revascularisation: Midterm Results.Int J Med Robot. 2025 Jun;21(3):e70071. doi: 10.1002/rcs.70071. Int J Med Robot. 2025. PMID: 40323097 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of two decades of reported outcomes for robotic coronary artery bypass grafting.Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jul 31;13(4):311-325. doi: 10.21037/acs-2023-rcabg-0191. Epub 2024 Jul 26. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024. PMID: 39157187 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of a force feedback function in a surgical robot on the suturing procedure.Surg Endosc. 2024 Mar;38(3):1222-1229. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10617-6. Epub 2023 Dec 13. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 38092971
References
-
- Cao C, Indraratna P, Doyle M et al (2016) A systematic review on robotic coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 5(6):530–543. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs.2016.11.08 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Mannacio V, De Vita AD, Antignano A et al (2014) Y-grafts with the left internal mammary artery and radial artery. Mid-term functional and angiographic results. Cohort study. Int J Surg 12:952–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.008 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hwang HY, Paeng JC, Oh HC, Kim YH, Kim KB (2015) Comparison of perfusion and thickening between vein and right internal thoracic artery composite grafts from a randomized trial substudy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 150:1187–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.009 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Turner WF, Sloan JH (2006) Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass on a beating heart: initial experience and implications for the future. Ann Thorac Surg 82:790–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.112 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources