Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 6;18(2):395-399.
doi: 10.5114/aoms.2019.85655. eCollection 2022.

Nasal bone to nasal tip length ratio for describing nasal bone hypoplasia and predicting trisomy 21

Emre Ekmekci  1   2 , Emine Demirel  2 , Sefa Kelekci  2
Affiliations

Nasal bone to nasal tip length ratio for describing nasal bone hypoplasia and predicting trisomy 21

Emre Ekmekci et al. Arch Med Sci. .

Abstract

Introduction: Fetal nasal bone hypoplasia has been proven to be a strong marker for trisomy 21 during second trimester ultrasonography. Rather than evaluating the nasal bone hypoplasia according to the nomograms, it may be possible to evaluate it with a more practical and specific method.

Material and methods: Retrospectively collected data were provided from the saved and stored patient data between 2012 and 2017. Nasal bone length and nasal tip length were measured and the ratio was calculated. The ratio ≤ 1/3 was defined as the threshold ratio for the definition of the marker. Nasal bone nasal tip length (NB/NL) ratio values were compared among groups with trisomy 21 and euploid fetuses.

Results: A total of 59 fetuses had trisomy 21 and 2304 euploid fetuses were included in the study. The ratio of nasal bone to nasal tip length was 1/3 and below in 21/59 (35.5%) of fetuses with trisomy 21 whereas this ratio was 31/2304 (1.3%) in euploid fetuses. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio of nasal bone/nasal tip ratio ≤ 1/3 were 35.5%, 98.6%, 26.4 and 0.6 for Down syndrome, respectively.

Conclusions: This study suggested that the nasal bone to nasal tip length ratio may be a new promising and practical sonographic marker in the second trimester genetic sonography. Although its sensitivity is not high, it seems to be more practical and specific than the evaluation of fetal nasal bone length.

Keywords: Down syndrome; nasal bone hypoplasia; nasal tip length; prenatal diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A – Nasal bone/nasal tip length ratio > 1/3 in euploid fetus, B – nasal bone/nasal tip length ratio ≤ 1/3 with Down syndrome fetus
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box and whisker plot of NB/NL ratio in fetuses with and without Down syndrome NB/NL – nasal bone nasal tip length ratio.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Receiver operating characteristic curve of NB/NL ratio only for detection of Down syndrome NB/NL – nasal bone nasal tip ratio, AUC – area under curve.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cicero S, Curcio P, Papageorghiou A, Sonek J, Nicolaides K. Absence of nasal bone in fetuses with trisomy 21 at 11–14 weeks of gestation: an observational study. Lancet. 2001;358:1665–7. - PubMed
    1. Cusick W, Provenzano J, Sullivan CA, Gallousis FM, Rodis JF. Fetal nasal bone length in euploid and aneuploid fetuses between 11 and 20 weeks’ gestation. J Ultrasound Med. 2004;23:1327–33. - PubMed
    1. Odibo AO, Sehdev HM, Dunn L, McDonald R, Macones GA. The association between fetal nasal bone hypoplasia and aneuploidy. Obstetrics Gynecol. 2004;104:1229–33. - PubMed
    1. Viora E, Errante G, Sciarrone A, et al. Fetal nasal bone and trisomy 21 in the second trimester. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2005;25:511–5. - PubMed
    1. Moreno-Cid M, Rubio-Lorente A, Rodriguez M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of performance of second-trimester nasal bone assessment in detection of fetuses with Down syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43:247–53. - PubMed