Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 4:13:840107.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840107. eCollection 2022.

Improving the Emotional Distress and the Experience of Hospitalization in Children and Adolescent Patients Through Animal Assisted Interventions: A Systematic Review

Cinzia Correale  1 , Marta Borgi  2 , Barbara Collacchi  2 , Chiara Falamesca  1 , Simonetta Gentile  3 , Federico Vigevano  4 , Simona Cappelletti  1 , Francesca Cirulli  2
Affiliations

Improving the Emotional Distress and the Experience of Hospitalization in Children and Adolescent Patients Through Animal Assisted Interventions: A Systematic Review

Cinzia Correale et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Animal Assisted Interventions (AAIs) are increasingly common in pediatric care settings as a means to promote the physical, mental, and emotional well-being of hospitalized children and adolescents.

Objectives: The aim of this work was to review published studies implementing AAIs in hospital settings and to assess the effects of AAIs on the biobehavioral response to stress and pain, social behavior, quality of life and level of satisfaction with hospitalization in children and adolescents. Stress and burden, quality of life, mood and level of satisfaction with hospitalization in parents/caregivers as well as stress and burden, perception of the work environment and job satisfaction in hospital staff were also reviewed.

Methods: All published studies reporting quantitative assessments were systematically searched using PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest and Web of Science databases in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The aim was to identify studies examining the effects of AAIs on behavioral, psychological and physiological responses to stress in children and adolescents (0-18 years) formally admitted to a hospital for a stay, as well as in those undergoing a visit for treatments or medical examinations.

Results: Of the 350 studies screened, 21 were eligible for inclusion. Most of them focused on stress, pain, and anxiety reduction in pediatric patients, and used both physiological parameters and behavioral and psychological observations/scales. All studies employed dogs. Results show the potential of AAIs to reduce anxiety and behavioral distress in pediatric patients while acting on physiological measures associated with arousal.

Conclusion: Although further, more rigorous studies are still needed, the findings of this review may have implications for clinical practices suggesting appropriate planning of AAIs by pediatric healthcare professionals.

Systematic review registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=178993], identifier [CRD42020178993].

Keywords: adolescents; animal-assisted interventions; anxiety; children; hospitalization; pain; pediatric patients; stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PRISMA flow diagram of the literature search (identification) and selection process (screening, eligibility, inclusion).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Percentages summary of risk-of-bias assessment using the RoB 2 tool (*effect of adhering to intervention).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Percentages summary of risk-of-bias assessment using the ROBIN-I tool.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Abrahamson K., Cai Y., Richards E., Cline K., O’Haire M. E. (2016). Perceptions of a hospital-based animal assisted intervention program: an exploratory study. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract. 25 150–154. 10.1016/j.ctcp.2016.10.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Antonelli E., Vagnoli L., Ciucci E., Vernucci C., Lachi F., Messeri A. (2019). A comparison of nonpharmacologic interventions on the emotional state of children in the Emergency Department. Pediatr. Emerg. Care 35 81–88. 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000900 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ávila-Álvarez A., Alonso-Bidegain M., De-Rosende-Celeiro I., Vizcaíno-Cela M., Larrañeta-Alcalde L., Torres-Tobío G. (2020). Improving social participation of children with autism spectrum disorder: pilot testing of an early animal-assisted intervention in Spain. Health Soc. Care Commun. 28 1220–1229. 10.1111/hsc.12955 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barker S. B., Knisely J. S., Schubert C. M., Green J. D., Ameringer S. (2015). The effect of an animal-assisted intervention on anxiety and pain in hospitalized children. Anthrozoos 28 101–112. 10.1016/j.eujim.2016.05.005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beetz A., Julius H., Turner D., Kotrschal K. (2012). Effects of social support by a dog on stress modulation in male children with insecure attachment. Front. Psychol. 3:352. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00352 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources