Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 16;8(1):e12275.
doi: 10.1002/trc2.12275. eCollection 2022.

Pathways explaining racial/ethnic disparities in incident all-cause and Alzheimer's disease dementia among older US men and women

Affiliations

Pathways explaining racial/ethnic disparities in incident all-cause and Alzheimer's disease dementia among older US men and women

May A Beydoun et al. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). .

Abstract

Introduction: Racial disparities in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and all-cause dementia (DEMENTIA) incidence may exist differentially among men and women, with unknown mechanisms.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study examining all-cause and AD dementia incidence was conducted linking Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicare data over ≤26 years of follow-up (1988 to 2014). Cox regression and generalized structural equation models (GSEMs) were constructed among men and women ≥60 years of age at baseline (N = 4592). Outcomes included onset ages of all-cause and AD dementia, whereas the main exposures were race/ethnicity contrasts (RACE_ETHN). Potential mediators) included socio-economic status (SES), lifestyle factors (dietary quality [DIET] nutritional biomarkers [NUTR], physical activity [PA], social support [SS], alcohol [ALCOHOL], poor health [or HEALTH], poor cognitive performance [or COGN]. In addition to RACE_ETHN, the following were exogenous covariates in the GSEM and potential confounders in Cox models: age, sex, urban-rural, household size, and marital status.

Results: Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) women had a higher risk of DEMENTIA versus non-Hispanic White (NHW) women in GSEM, consistent with Cox models (age-adjusted model: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10 to 1.61). The total effect of this RACE_ETHN contrast in women was explained by four main pathways: (1) RACE_ETHN→ poor cognitive performance (COGN, +) → DEMENTIA (+); (2) RACE_ETHN → SES (-) → COGN (-) → DEMENTIA (+); (3) RACE_ETHN → SES (-) → physical activity (PA, +) → COGN (-) → DEMENTIA (+); and (4) RACE_ETHN → SES (-) → DIET (+) → COGN (-) → DEMENTIA (+). A reduced AD risk in Mexican American (MA) women versus NHW women upon adjustment for SES and downstream factors (HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.80). For the non-White versus NHW contrast in incident DEMENTIA, pathways involved lower SES, directly increasing cognitive deficits (or indirectly through lifestyle factors), which then directly increases DEMENTIA .

Discussion: Socioeconomic and lifestyle factors explaining disparities between NHB and NHW in dementia onset among women are important to consider for future observational and intervention studies.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; aging; dementia; modifiable risk factors; racial disparities; structural equations modeling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Full generalized structural equation model (GSEM) and hypothesized pathway. AD = Alzheimer's disease; ALCOHOL = alcohol consumption, z‐score; COGN = cognitive performance principal component variable (four measured variables); DIET/NUTR = diet and nutritional biomarkers z‐score variable (two dietary quality measures and four nutritional biomarkers); HEALTH = health‐related factors as mean of z‐scores for allostatic load, self‐rated health, co‐morbidity index and body mass index; LIFESTYLE = lifestyle‐related factors composed of social support, physical activity, diet/nutritional biomarkers, smoking, and alcohol consumption using means of z‐scores for related measured variables; MA = Mexican American; NHANES III = Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; NHB = non‐Hispanic Black; NHW = non‐Hispanic White; PA = physical activity z‐score variable (three measured variables); RACE_ETHN = racial/ethnic contrast; SES = socio‐economic status mean of z‐scores composed of poverty income ratio and education (years); SMOKING = smoking z‐score variable (two measured variables); SS = social support z‐score variable (five measured variables). See Methods section for more details. Notes: Plain arrows are statistically significant associations (P < 0.05) within the hypothesized pathway; dashed arrows are statistically significant associations (P < 0.05) outside the hypothesized pathway
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Generalized structural equation model (GSEM) findings for three race/ethnicity contrasts among men and women, NHANES III (1988‐1994): Final eligible sample (N = 4592). AD = Alzheimer's Disease; ALCOHOL = alcohol consumption, z‐score; COGN = Cognitive performance principal component variable (four measured variables); DIET/NUTR = diet and nutritional biomarkers z‐score variable (two dietary quality measures and four nutritional biomarkers); HEALTH = health‐related factors as mean of z‐scores for allostatic load, self‐rated health, co‐morbidity index and body mass index; LIFESTYLE = lifestyle‐related factors composed of social support, physical activity, diet/nutritional biomarkers, smoking and alcohol consumption using means of z‐scores for related measured variables; MA = Mexican American; N = Number of participants; NHANES III = Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; NHB = non‐Hispanic Black; NHW = non‐Hispanic White; PA = physical activity z‐score variable (three measured variables); RACE_ETHN = racial/ethnic contrast; SES = socio‐economic status mean of z‐scores composed of poverty income ratio and education (years); SMOKING = smoking z‐score variable (two measured variables); SS = social support z‐score variable (five measured variables); TE = total effect; See Methods section for more details. Notes: Plain arrows are statistically significant associations (P < .05) within the hypothesized pathway; dashed arrows are statistically significant associations (P < .05) outside the hypothesized pathway; red arrows indicate positive (+) associations; blue arrows indicate inverse (−) associations
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Generalized structural equation model (GSEM) findings for non‐White versus NHW racial/ethnic contrast versus DEMENTIA, NHANES III (1988‐1994): Final eligible sample (N = 4592). ALCOHOL = alcohol consumption, z‐score; COGN = cognitive performance principal component variable (four measured variables); DIET/NUTR = diet and nutritional biomarkers z‐score variable (two dietary quality measures and four nutritional biomarkers); HEALTH = health‐related factors as mean of z‐scores for allostatic load, self‐rated health, co‐morbidity index, and body mass index; LIFESTYLE = lifestyle‐related factors composed of social support, physical activity, diet/nutritional biomarkers, smoking, and alcohol consumption using means of z‐scores for related measured variables; MA = Mexican American; N = number of participants; N' = number of observations; NHANES III = Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; NHB = non‐Hispanic Black; NHW = non‐Hispanic White; PA = physical activity z‐score variable (three measured variables); RACE_ETHN = racial/ethnic contrast; SES = socio‐economic status mean of z‐scores composed of poverty income ratio and education (years); SMOKING = smoking z‐score variable (two measured variables); SS = social support z‐score variable (five measured variables); TE = total effect; see Methods section for more details. Notes: Plain arrows are statistically significant associations (P < 0.05) within the hypothesized pathway; dashed arrows are statistically significant associations (P < 0.05) outside the hypothesized pathway; red arrows indicate positive (+) associations; blue arrows indicate inverse (−) associations

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sosa‐Ortiz AL, Acosta‐Castillo I, Prince MJ. Epidemiology of dementias and Alzheimer's disease. Arch Med Res. 2012;43:600‐608. - PubMed
    1. Lindeboom J, Weinstein H. Neuropsychology of cognitive ageing, minimal cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, and vascular cognitive impairment. Eur J Pharmacol. 2004;490:83‐86. - PubMed
    1. Helmer C, Pasquier F, Dartigues JF. Epidemiology of Alzheimer disease and related disorders. Med Sci. 2006;22:288‐296. - PubMed
    1. Honjo K, van Reekum R, Verhoeff NP. Alzheimer's disease and infection: do infectious agents contribute to progression of Alzheimer's disease?. Alzheimers Dement. 2009;5:348‐360. - PubMed
    1. Matthews KA, Xu W, Gaglioti AH, et al. Racial and ethnic estimates of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in the United States (2015‐2060) in adults aged >/= 65 years. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15:17‐24. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources