Early detection of noise-induced hearing loss
- PMID: 35317152
- PMCID: PMC8891767
- DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i6.1815
Early detection of noise-induced hearing loss
Abstract
Background: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is the second most common acquired hearing loss following presbycusis. Exposure to recreational noise and minimal use of hearing protection increase the prevalence of NIHL in young females. NIHL is irreversible. Identifying minor hearing pathologies before they progress to hearing problems that affect daily life is crucial.
Aim: To compare the advantages and disadvantages of extended high frequency (EHF) and otoacoustic emission and determine an indicator of hearing pathologies at the early sub-clinical stage.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was implemented in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from May to September 2019. A total of 86 participants, aged 18-22 years, were recruited to establish normative thresholds for EHF. Another 159 adults, aged 18-25 years with normal hearing (0.25-8 kHz ≤ 25 dBHL), were allocated to low noise and noise exposure groups. Distortion otoacoustic emission (DPOAE), transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), and EHF were assessed in the two groups to determine the superior technique for detecting early-stage noise-induced pathologies. The chi-square test was used to assess the noise and low noise exposure groups with respect to extended high-frequency audiometry (EHFA), DPOAE, and TEOAE. P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: A total of 86 participants (66 females and 20 males) aged between 18 and 22 (average: 20.58 ± 1.13) years were recruited to establish normative thresholds for EHF. The normative thresholds for 9, 10, 11.2, 12.5, 14, 16, 18, and 20 kHz were 15, 10, 20, 15, 15, 20, 28, and 0 dBHL, respectively. A total of 201 participants were recruited and examined for eligibility. Among them, 159 adults aged between 18 and 25 years were eligible in this study. No statistical difference was detected between the noise exposure and the low noise exposure groups using EHFA, DPOAE, and TEOAE (P > 0.05) except in the right ear at 4 kHz using TEOAE (abnormal rate 20.4% vs 5.2%, respectively; P = 0.05).
Conclusion: These results showed TEOAE as the earliest indicator of minor pathology compared to DPOAE and EHFA. However, a multicenter controlled study or prospective study is essential to verify these results.
Keywords: Early detection superiority; Extended high frequency; Hearing loss; Noise; Noise-induced hearing loss; Otoacoustic emission.
©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: None.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of the possible effect of magnetic resonance imaging noise on peripheral hearing organ with the otoacoustic emission.Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 Nov-Dec;41(6):102586. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102586. Epub 2020 Jun 20. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020. PMID: 32629148
-
Otoacoustic emissions in early noise-induced hearing loss.Otol Neurotol. 2007 Sep;28(6):745-52. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3180a726c9. Otol Neurotol. 2007. PMID: 17721363
-
The Immediate and Long-Term Impact of Military Aircraft Noise on Hearing: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Fighter Pilots and Ground Staff.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 14;18(6):2982. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062982. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33799421 Free PMC article.
-
Prevention of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Using Investigational Medicines for the Inner Ear: Previous Trial Outcomes Should Inform Future Trial Design.Antioxid Redox Signal. 2022 Jun;36(16-18):1171-1202. doi: 10.1089/ars.2021.0166. Epub 2021 Oct 4. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2022. PMID: 34346254 Free PMC article. Review.
-
High-Frequency Audiometry for Early Detection of Hearing Loss: A Narrative Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 28;18(9):4702. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094702. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33925120 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Audiological Methods for Early Detection of Hearing Loss in Healthcare Worker.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 10;13(10):1113. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13101113. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40427950 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship between hypertension/blood pressure and hearing sensitivity among drivers: A correlation analysis.J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Nov 27;12:409. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_468_23. eCollection 2023. J Educ Health Promot. 2023. PMID: 38333176 Free PMC article.
-
A Comprehensive Review of Auditory and Non-Auditory Effects of Noise on Human Health.Noise Health. 2024 Apr-Jun 01;26(121):59-69. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_124_23. Epub 2024 Jun 21. Noise Health. 2024. PMID: 38904803 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Occupational epidemiological characteristics of noise-induced hearing loss and the impact of combined exposure to noise and dust on workers' hearing-a retrospective study.Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 30;12:1488065. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1488065. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39540095 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of Therapeutic Options for Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: Retroauricular Injection of Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate Combined with Hyperbaric Oxygenation.Noise Health. 2024 Jul-Sep 01;26(122):370-375. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_60_24. Epub 2024 Sep 30. Noise Health. 2024. PMID: 39345079 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jansen EJ, Helleman HW, Dreschler WA, de Laat JA. Noise induced hearing loss and other hearing complaints among musicians of symphony orchestras. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009;82:153–164. - PubMed
-
- Imam L, Hannan SA. Noise-induced hearing loss: a modern epidemic? Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2017;78:286–290. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources