Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 28;19(2):115-124.
doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.02.003.

Usefulness of Impella support in different clinical settings in cardiogenic shock

Affiliations

Usefulness of Impella support in different clinical settings in cardiogenic shock

María Isabel Barrionuevo-Sánchez et al. J Geriatr Cardiol. .

Abstract

Background: The Impella pump has emerged as a promising tool in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). Despite its attractive properties, there are scarce data on the specific clinical setting and the potential role of Impella devices in CS patients from routine clinical practice.

Methods: This is an observational, retrospective, single center, cohort study. All consecutive patients with diagnosis of CS and undergoing support with Impella 2.5®, Impella CP® or Impella 5.0® from April 2015 to December 2020 were included. Baseline characteristics, management and outcomes were assessed according to CS severity, age and cause of CS. Main outcome measured was in-hospital mortality.

Results: A total of 50 patients were included (median age: 59.3 ± 10 years). The most common cause of CS was acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (68%), followed by decompensation of previous cardiomyopathy (22%). A total of 13 patients (26%) had profound CS. Most patients (54%) improved pulmonary congestion at 48 h after Impella support. A total of 19 patients (38%) presented significant bleeding. In-hospital mortality was 42%. Among patients with profound CS (n = 13), five patients were previously supported with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. A total of eight patients (61.5%) died during the admission, and no patient achieved ventricular recovery. Older patients (≥ 67 years, n = 10) had more comorbidities and the highest mortality (70%). Among patients with ACS (n = 34), 35.3% of patients had profound CS; and in most cases (52.9%), Impella support was performed as a bridge to recovery. In contrast, only one patient from the decompensated cardiomyopathy group (n = 11) presented with profound CS. In 90.9% of these cases, Impella support was used as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. There were no cases of death.

Conclusions: In this cohort of real-life CS patients, Impella devices were used in different settings, with different clinical profiles and management. Despite a significant rate of complications, mortality was acceptable and lower than those observed in other series.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chera HH, Nagar M, Chang NL, et al Overview of Impella and mechanical devices in cardiogenic shock. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018;15:293–299. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1456334. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:3599–3726. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ouweneel DM, de Brabander J, Karami M, et al Real-life use of left ventricular circulatory support with Impella in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: 12 years AMC experience. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019;8:338–349. doi: 10.1177/2048872618805486. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jensen PB, Kann SH, Veien KT, et al Single-centre experience with the Impella CP, 5.0 and RP in 109 consecutive patients with profound cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018;7:53–61. doi: 10.1177/2048872617743194. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheng JM, den Uil CA, Hoeks SE, et al Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:2102–2108. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp292. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources