Usefulness of Impella support in different clinical settings in cardiogenic shock
- PMID: 35317396
- PMCID: PMC8915417
- DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.02.003
Usefulness of Impella support in different clinical settings in cardiogenic shock
Abstract
Background: The Impella pump has emerged as a promising tool in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). Despite its attractive properties, there are scarce data on the specific clinical setting and the potential role of Impella devices in CS patients from routine clinical practice.
Methods: This is an observational, retrospective, single center, cohort study. All consecutive patients with diagnosis of CS and undergoing support with Impella 2.5®, Impella CP® or Impella 5.0® from April 2015 to December 2020 were included. Baseline characteristics, management and outcomes were assessed according to CS severity, age and cause of CS. Main outcome measured was in-hospital mortality.
Results: A total of 50 patients were included (median age: 59.3 ± 10 years). The most common cause of CS was acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (68%), followed by decompensation of previous cardiomyopathy (22%). A total of 13 patients (26%) had profound CS. Most patients (54%) improved pulmonary congestion at 48 h after Impella support. A total of 19 patients (38%) presented significant bleeding. In-hospital mortality was 42%. Among patients with profound CS (n = 13), five patients were previously supported with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. A total of eight patients (61.5%) died during the admission, and no patient achieved ventricular recovery. Older patients (≥ 67 years, n = 10) had more comorbidities and the highest mortality (70%). Among patients with ACS (n = 34), 35.3% of patients had profound CS; and in most cases (52.9%), Impella support was performed as a bridge to recovery. In contrast, only one patient from the decompensated cardiomyopathy group (n = 11) presented with profound CS. In 90.9% of these cases, Impella support was used as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. There were no cases of death.
Conclusions: In this cohort of real-life CS patients, Impella devices were used in different settings, with different clinical profiles and management. Despite a significant rate of complications, mortality was acceptable and lower than those observed in other series.
Copyright and License information: Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 2022.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of mechanical circulatory support with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or Impella for patients with cardiogenic shock: a propensity-matched analysis.Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Sep;110(9):1404-1411. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01777-9. Epub 2020 Nov 13. Clin Res Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 33185749 Free PMC article.
-
Management and outcome of patients supported with Impella 5.0 for refractory cardiogenic shock.Crit Care. 2015 Oct 9;19:363. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1073-8. Crit Care. 2015. PMID: 26453047 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of serum albumin levels before IMPELLA insertion on mortality risk in patients with cardiogenic shock.Heart Vessels. 2025 Apr 8. doi: 10.1007/s00380-025-02539-1. Online ahead of print. Heart Vessels. 2025. PMID: 40198374
-
Short term outcomes of Impella in cardiogenic shock: A review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Int J Cardiol. 2021 Feb 1;324:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.09.044. Epub 2020 Sep 22. Int J Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 32971148 Review.
-
The Role of Impella in Cardiogenic Shock Complicated by an Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 18;14(2):611. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020611. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 39860617 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
METTL3 boosts mitochondrial fission and induces cardiac fibrosis after ischemia/reperfusion injury.Int J Biol Sci. 2024 Jan 1;20(2):433-445. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.87535. eCollection 2024. Int J Biol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38169612 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiogenic shock: approaching the truth.J Geriatr Cardiol. 2022 Feb 28;19(2):95-97. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.02.001. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 35317393 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
PKM2 interacts with and phosphorylates PHB2 to sustain mitochondrial quality control against septic cerebral-cardiac injury.Int J Med Sci. 2024 Jan 21;21(4):633-643. doi: 10.7150/ijms.92367. eCollection 2024. Int J Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 38464826 Free PMC article.
-
Pgam5-mediated PHB2 dephosphorylation contributes to endotoxemia-induced myocardial dysfunction by inhibiting mitophagy and the mitochondrial unfolded protein response.Int J Biol Sci. 2023 Aug 28;19(14):4657-4671. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.85767. eCollection 2023. Int J Biol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37781037 Free PMC article.
-
Concurrent Use of Kidney Replacement Therapy and Temporary Left Ventricular Assist Device in Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Blood Purif. 2025 Jun 18:1-16. doi: 10.1159/000546854. Online ahead of print. Blood Purif. 2025. PMID: 40532684 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous