Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 18;10(3):e4115.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004115. eCollection 2022 Mar.

Role of Electrical Stimulation in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Systematic Review

Rawan ElAbd  1 , Abdulaziz Alabdulkarim  2 , Salman AlSabah  1 , Jessica Hazan  2 , Becher Alhalabi  2   3 , Stephanie Thibaudeau  2
Affiliations

Role of Electrical Stimulation in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Systematic Review

Rawan ElAbd et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .

Abstract

Functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury is often suboptimal despite the intrinsic permissive growth environment of the peripheral nervous system. The objective of this systematic review is to explore the use of electrical stimulation (ES) for peripheral nerve regeneration.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted from inception to March 2, 2021 to retrieve articles on ES for peripheral nerve regeneration using the PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase databases. Primary outcome measures included objective measures of motor and sensory nerve function.

Results: Four randomized control trials, two case reports, and three case series that addressed the aims were identified. The stimulation parameters varied greatly between studies, without an apparent commonality for a given electrical conduit. Outcomes measured included motor (n = 8) and sensory (n = 7) modalities (cold detection, static two-point discrimination, tactile discrimination, and pressure detection), nerve-specific muscle function and bulk, and electromyography (EMG) motor and sensory terminal latency. Different parameters for measurement were utilized and improvement was observed across the studies compared with controls (n = 4) or pre-intervention measurements (n = 5). One randomized control trial reported no benefit of ES and attributed their findings to their stimulation protocol. Complications were documented in three patients only and included wire remnant removal, skin pigmentation, and bone formation.

Conclusions: ES in peripheral nerve regeneration is beneficial in improving and accelerating recovery. A meta-analysis was not performed due to the heterogeneity, but all studies showed positive findings and minor to no complications. These results provide a primer for further development of delivery methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Huckhagel T, Nüchtern J, Regelsberger J, et al. ; TraumaRegister DGU. Nerve injury in severe trauma with upper extremity involvement: evaluation of 49,382 patients from the TraumaRegister DGU between 2002 and 2015. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018;26:76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huckhagel T, Nüchtern J, Regelsberger J, et al. ; TraumaRegister DGU. Nerve trauma of the lower extremity: evaluation of 60,422 leg injured patients from the TraumaRegister DGU between 2002 and 2015. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018;26:40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Willand MP, Nguyen MA, Borschel GH, et al. . Electrical stimulation to promote peripheral nerve regeneration. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016;30:490–496. - PubMed
    1. Elzinga K, Tyreman N, Ladak A, et al. . Brief electrical stimulation improves nerve regeneration after delayed repair in Sprague Dawley rats. Exp Neurol. 2015;269:142–153. - PubMed
    1. Lee SK, Wolfe SW. Peripheral nerve injury and repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8:243–252. - PubMed