Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 22;22(1):570.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12902-w.

A cross-sectional study of factors associated with regular dog walking and intention to walk the dog

Affiliations

A cross-sectional study of factors associated with regular dog walking and intention to walk the dog

Carri Westgarth et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Dog walking is important for public health and dog welfare, yet some owners do not walk with their dogs regularly. This study examined factors associated with participation in regular dog walking and intention to dog walk, in order to inform physical activity interventions.

Methods: 191 dog-owning adults from a UK community were surveyed about their participation in dog walking, intention to dog walk, attitudes and behavioural beliefs regarding dog walking, and dog and owner demographics. Principal components analysis identified owner profiles regarding attitudes and behavioural beliefs about dog walking. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with being a regular dog walker (achieving 150mins per week of dog walking) and having a high intention to dog walk (at least 30 mins per day for at least 5 days per week over the next month).

Results: Participants walked with their dogs for a median 7 times/week and 230 total minutes/week; regular dog walkers 9 times/week (400 minutes/week), compared to twice/week for irregular dog walkers (45 minutes/week). Being a regular dog walker was positively associated with having a high level of intention to walk the dog in the next month (OR=12.1 95%CI=3.5-42.4, P<0.001), being married or living with a partner (OR=33.5, 95%CI=2.5-458.8, P=0.01), and higher scores on a dog walking habit index (OR=2.1, 95%CI=1.3-3.5, P<0.01). However, higher support from friends for walking was negatively associated with being a regular dog walker (OR=0.3, 95%CI=0.1-0.7, P<0.01). High intention to dog walk was associated with female owners (OR=4.7, 95%CI=1.2-18.5, P=0.03), dogs that lay on the sofa (OR=6.9, 95%CI=1.5-31.8, P=0.01), high levels of self-efficacy to walk the dog over the next month (OR=5.8, 95%CI=1.5-21.9, P=0.01), owner type with an attitude of high responsibility and enjoyment from walking (OR=2.1, 95%CI=1.2-3.8, P=0.02), and higher scores on a dog walking habit index (OR=1.9, 95%CI=1.0-3.7, P=0.05). Reporting someone else walks the dog was negatively associated with high intention (OR=0.1, 95%CI=0.0-0.7, P=0.02).

Conclusions: Interventions to promote dog walking may benefit from increasing intention to dog walk in male owners, forming schedules and routines that involve multiple household members in dog walking, and establishing habits around dog walking. Interventions may also need to address how to overcome barriers and perceived challenges in regards to self-efficacy of dog walking, that may prevent intention from being translated into action.

Keywords: Attitude; Dogs; Exercise; Intention; Pets; Public Health; Walking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CW has previously been a funded consultant on the human-animal bond for Forthglade Dog Food. RC currently works for Dogs Trust but did not at the time of this study. There are no conflicts of interest for HC. There are no other financial or non-financial conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Dog outcome evaluation survey responses of 191 dog-owning adults in a community in Cheshire, UK. Question - The benefits to dogs from being walked most days include (strongly disagree; disagree; neither agree nor disagree; agree; strongly agree)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Behavioural belief strength survey responses of 191 dog-owning adults in a community in Cheshire, UK. Question - Assuming you walked with your dog daily, how likely or unlikely is it that each of the following would occur (very unlikely; unlikely; neither unlikely or likely; likely; very likely)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Perceived behavioural control (PBC) survey responses of 191 dog-owning adults in a community in Cheshire, UK. Question - Assuming you tried to walk with your dog daily how likely are you to be affected by (very unlikely; unlikely; neither unlikely or likely; likely; very likely). Scores averaged from responses to two options – 1) would make me walk my dog less often, 2) would make dog walks shorter
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Other attitudes to dog walking survey responses of 191 dog-owning adults in a community in Cheshire, UK. Question - To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements (not applicable; strongly disagree; disagree; neither agree nor disagree; agree; strongly agree)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Paluska SA, Schwenk TL. Physical Activity and Mental Health. Sports Medicine. 2000;29(3):167–180. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200029030-00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):219–229. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rhodes RE, Janssen I, Bredin SSD, Warburton DER, Bauman A. Physical activity: Health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions. Psychology & Health. 2017;32(8):942–975. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2017.1325486. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Powell KE, Paluch AE, Blair SN: Physical Activity for Health: What Kind? How much? How Intense? On Top of What? In: Annual Review of Public Health, Vol 32. Volume 32, edn. Edited by Fielding JE, Brownson RC, Green LW. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews; 2011: 349-365. - PubMed
    1. Ogilvie D, Foster CE, Rothnie H, Cavill N, Hamilton V, Fitzsimons CF, Mutrie N, on behalf of the Scottish Physical Activity Research C: Interventions to promote walking: systematic review. In., vol. 334; 2007: 1204-. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources