Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 22;18(1):112.
doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03204-9.

In Vitro assessment of anti-Campylobacter activity of lactobacillus strains isolated from canine rectal swabs

Affiliations

In Vitro assessment of anti-Campylobacter activity of lactobacillus strains isolated from canine rectal swabs

Anna Tomusiak-Plebanek et al. BMC Vet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Campylobacteriosis is currently the most frequently reported zoonosis. Dogs, especially puppies or those with diarrhea, are considered a possible source of human infection. Probiotic bacteria, such as Lactobacillus species, seem to be a valuable tool in controlling of intestinal pathogenic microorganisms in dogs. The main purpose of this study was to assess the anti-Campylobacter activity and some probiotic properties, like ability to produce H2O2, bile salt and low pH tolerance of Lactobacillus strains isolated from gastrointestinal tract of healthy dogs.

Results: A total of 39 rectal swabs derived from healthy dogs and 19 from dogs with diarrhea were examined to detect Lactobacillus and Campylobacter bacteria respectively. In total, 30 strains of Lactobacillus genus and four strains of Campylobacter genus were isolated and identified. Of the 30 strains of Lactobacillus, 22 showed an inhibitory effect towards Campylobacter. Four strains with the strongest antagonism towards Campylobacter bacteria (L. salivarius 25 K/L/1, L. rhamnosus 42 K/L/2, L. sakei 50 K/L/1 and L. agilis 55 K/L/1) were selected to assess their potential probiotic traits. Three out of four analyzed strains produced extracellular H2O2. All displayed very good or moderate survival at pH 3.0 and 2.0 and showed high tolerance to 0.5% and 1% bile salts.

Conclusions: Among selected Lactobacillus strains, all may have a potential probiotic application in reducing Campylobacter spp. in dogs and thus prevent transmission of infection to humans, although the best candidate for probiotic seems to be L. sakei 50 K/L/1. Further in vitro and in vivo studies are needed.

Keywords: Antibacterial activity; Campylobacter; Dog; Lactobacillus; Probiotics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Antagonistic activity of some Lactobacillus isolates against reference strains of Campylobacter in the agar slab method
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relation of Campylobacter number [log CFU/ml] with the antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus strains. Error bars represent standard errors. Asterisks indicate the statistical differences: * P < 0.05

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. WHO Estimates of the Global Burden of Foodborne Diseases: Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference Group 2007–2015. 2015. Available online at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/199350. Accessed 09 Nov 2021.
    1. EFSA and ECDC (European Food Safety Authority and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control) The European Union One Health 2019 Zoonoses Report. EFSA J. 2021;19:6406. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heredia N, Garcia S. Animals as sources of food-borne pathogens: A review. Anim Nutr. 2018;4(3):250–255. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iannino F, Di Donato G, Ruggieri E, Salucci S, De Massis F, Di Giannatale E. Campylobacter infections, a significant issue of veterinary urban hygiene: dog-related risk factors. Vet Ital. 2017;53(2):111–120. - PubMed
    1. Kolackova I, Duskova M, Vojkovska H, Bardon J, Pudova V, Karpiskova R. Dogs as a possible source of human Campylobacter infections. Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek. 2015;21(2):36–40. - PubMed