Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Mar 22;21(1):38.
doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00928-1.

What are the personal last wishes of people with a life-limiting illness? Findings from a longitudinal observational study in specialist palliative care

Anneke Ullrich  1 , Wiebke Hollburg  2 , Holger Schulz  3 , Sven Goldbach  2 , Annette Rommel  4 , Marten Müller  5 , Denise Kirsch  6 , Katrin Kopplin-Foertsch  7 , Julia Messerer  8 , Louise König  8 , Frank Schulz-Kindermann  2 , Carsten Bokemeyer  8 , Karin Oechsle  8
Affiliations
Observational Study

What are the personal last wishes of people with a life-limiting illness? Findings from a longitudinal observational study in specialist palliative care

Anneke Ullrich et al. BMC Palliat Care. .

Abstract

Background: Personal last wishes of people facing a life-limiting illness may change closer to death and may vary across different forms of specialist palliative care (SPC).

Aims: To explore the presence and common themes of last wishes over time and according to the SPC settings (inpatient vs. home-based SPC), and to identify factors associated to having a last wish.

Methods: Patients enrolled in a longitudinal study completed questionnaires at the onset (baseline, t0) and within the first 6 weeks (follow-up, t1) of SPC including an open-ended question on their personal last wishes. Last wishes were content analyzed, and all wishes were coded for presence or absence of each of the identified themes. Changes of last wishes (t0-t1) were analyzed by a McNemar test. The chi-square-test was used to compare the two SPC settings. Predictors for the presence of a last wish were identified by logistic regression analysis.

Results: Three hundred sixty-one patients (mean age, 69.5 years; 49% female) answered at t0, and 130 at t1. In cross-sectional analyses, the presence of last wishes was higher at t0 (67%) than at t1 (59%). Comparisons revealed a higher presence of last wishes among inpatients than those in home-based SPC at t0 (78% vs. 62%; p = .002), but not at t1. Inpatient SPC (OR = 1.987, p = .011) and greater physical symptom burden over the past week (OR = 1.168, p < .001) predicted presence of a last wish at t0. Common themes of last wishes were Travel, Activities, Regaining health, Quality of life, Being with family and friends, Dying comfortably, Turn back time, and Taking care of final matters. The most frequent theme was Travel, at both t0 (31%) and t1 (39%). Themes did not differ between SPC settings, neither at t0 nor at t1. Longitudinal analyses (t0-t1) showed no significant intra-personal changes in the presence or any themes of last wishes over time.

Conclusions: In this late phase of their illness, many patients voiced last wishes. Our study suggests working with such wishes as a framework for person-centered care. Comparisons of SPC settings indicate that individualized approaches to patients' last wishes, rather than setting-specific approaches, may be important.

Keywords: End-of-life Care; Longitudinal Study; Palliative Care; Patient; Patient-centered care; Wish.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram for the creation of the study sample
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Buchmann KE. Sterben und Tod: Gelassen und angstfrei mit dem Lebensende umgehen. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2016.
    1. Mak JM, Clinton M. Promoting a Good Death: an agenda for outcomes research-a review of the literature. Nurs Ethics. 1999;6:97–106. 10.1177/096973309900600202. - PubMed
    1. Granda-Cameron C, Houldin A. Concept analysis of good death in terminally ill patients. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2012;29:632–639. doi: 10.1177/1049909111434976. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meier EA, Gallegos JV, Thomas LPM, et al. Defining a Good Death (Successful Dying): Literature Review and a Call for Research and Public Dialogue. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016;24:261–271. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2016.01.135. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, et al. Preparing for the end of life: preferences of patients, families, physicians, and other care providers. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001;22:727–37. 10.1016/s0885-3924(01)00334-7. - PubMed

Publication types