What senior academics can do to support reproducible and open research: a short, three-step guide
- PMID: 35317865
- PMCID: PMC8938725
- DOI: 10.1186/s13104-022-05999-0
What senior academics can do to support reproducible and open research: a short, three-step guide
Abstract
Increasingly, policies are being introduced to reward and recognise open research practices, while the adoption of such practices into research routines is being facilitated by many grassroots initiatives. However, despite this widespread endorsement and support, as well as various efforts led by early career researchers, open research is yet to be widely adopted. For open research to become the norm, initiatives should engage academics from all career stages, particularly senior academics (namely senior lecturers, readers, professors) given their routine involvement in determining the quality of research. Senior academics, however, face unique challenges in implementing policy changes and supporting grassroots initiatives. Given that-like all researchers-senior academics are motivated by self-interest, this paper lays out three feasible steps that senior academics can take to improve the quality and productivity of their research, that also serve to engender open research. These steps include changing (a) hiring criteria, (b) how scholarly outputs are credited, and (c) how we fund and publish in line with open research principles. The guidance we provide is accompanied by material for further reading.
Keywords: Authorship; Funding; Publishing; Reform; Replication; Reproducibility.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
All authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Emotions and feelings in neuroscience education across career stages: a qualitative study with views from alumni, junior and senior academics.BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 20;25(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06546-0. BMC Med Educ. 2025. PMID: 39979889 Free PMC article.
-
Who support open access publishing? Gender, discipline, seniority and other factors associated with academics' OA practice.Scientometrics. 2017;111(2):557-579. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2316-z. Epub 2017 Mar 6. Scientometrics. 2017. PMID: 28490821 Free PMC article.
-
Awareness of predatory publishing for Peruvian university professors and lecturers doing research.Account Res. 2020 Aug;27(6):390-395. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1775592. Epub 2020 Jun 6. Account Res. 2020. PMID: 32506970
-
Establishing a 'track record': research productivity and nursing academe.Aust J Adv Nurs. 1998 Sep-Nov;16(1):29-33. Aust J Adv Nurs. 1998. PMID: 9807282 Review.
-
Distinguishing Predatory from Reputable Publishing Practices.J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Aug;26(8):956-960. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.8.956. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020. PMID: 32715959 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review.PLoS One. 2023 Sep 15;18(9):e0291627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291627. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37713422 Free PMC article.
-
A scoping review on what constitutes a good research culture.F1000Res. 2024 Oct 14;13:324. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.147599.3. eCollection 2024. F1000Res. 2024. PMID: 38826614 Free PMC article.
-
Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jun 5;21(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021. PMID: 34090351 Free PMC article.
-
Open Developmental Science: An Overview and Annotated Reading List.Infant Child Dev. 2024 Jan-Feb;33(1):e2334. doi: 10.1002/icd.2334. Epub 2022 May 18. Infant Child Dev. 2024. PMID: 39308897 Free PMC article.
-
Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes.R Soc Open Sci. 2023 May 17;10(5):221255. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221255. eCollection 2023 May. R Soc Open Sci. 2023. PMID: 37206965 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Baker M, Dolgin E. Cancer reproducibility project releases first results. Nat News. 2017;541(7637):269. - PubMed
-
- Borregaard MK, Hart EM. Towards a more reproducible ecology. Ecography. 2016;39(4):349–353.
-
- Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science [Internet]. 2015 Aug 28 [cited 2020 Jul 14];349(6251). Available from: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/349/6251/aac4716. - PubMed
-
- Drucker DJ. Never waste a good crisis: confronting reproducibility in translational research. Cell Metab. 2016;24(3):348–360. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources