Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May:163:112923.
doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2022.112923. Epub 2022 Mar 19.

An assessment of vaping-induced inflammation and toxicity: A feasibility study using a 2-stage zebrafish and mouse platform

Affiliations

An assessment of vaping-induced inflammation and toxicity: A feasibility study using a 2-stage zebrafish and mouse platform

Rob U Onyenwoke et al. Food Chem Toxicol. 2022 May.

Abstract

It is currently understood that tobacco smoking is a major cause of pulmonary disease due to pulmonary/lung inflammation. However, due to a highly dynamic market place and an abundance of diverse products, less is known about the effects of e-cigarette (E-cig) use on the lung. In addition, varieties of E-cig liquids (e-liquids), which deliver nicotine and numerous flavor chemicals into the lungs, now number in the 1000s. Thus, a critical need exists for safety evaluations of these E-cig products. Herein, we employed a "2-stage in vivo screening platform" (zebrafish to mouse) to assess the safety profiles of e-liquids. Using the zebrafish, we collected embryo survival data after e-liquid exposure as well as neutrophil migration data, a key hallmark for a pro-inflammatory response. Our data indicate that certain e-liquids induce an inflammatory response in our zebrafish model and that e-liquid exposure alone results in pro-inflammatory lung responses in our C57BL/6J model, data collected from lung staining and ELISA analysis, respectively, in the mouse. Thus, our platform can be used as an initial assessment to ascertain the safety profiles of e-liquid using acute inflammatory responses (zebrafish, Stage 1) as our initial metric followed by chronic studies (C57BL/6J, Stage 2).

Keywords: C57BL/6J; Electronic cigarette (E-cig); Inflammation; Safety profile; Zebrafish; e-liquids.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. E-liquid exposure affects the survival of zebrafish embryos.
Survival rate of embryos after e-liquid exposure (Menthol, Virginia Tobacco (VT) or Mint) from 3 to 5 days-post-fertilization (dpf). CTL is embryo medium only. Sodium trimethylsilylpropanesulfonate (DSS) and trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS) are known pro-inflammatory reagents. PG/VG is the vehicle control for the e-liquid. n = 8–10 embryos per group.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Neutrophil migration assay in the Tg(lysC:dsRed) transgenic zebrafish.
(A) In the control, neutrophils are localized around the vascular niche of the caudal hematopoietic tissue (CHT) at resting state during normal development in transgenic Tg(lysC:dsRed) zebrafish. Activation of neutrophils, i.e., by the Mint e-liquid promotes migration from the vascular niche of the CHT, a well-known hallmark for a pro-inflammatory response. (B) Pattern analysis, i.e., the summation of all Nearest Neighbor Distances, is an indicator of dispersed neutrophils. Boxes in (A) indicate the posterior trunk/tail region of zebrafish embryos. (C) Quantification of the neutrophil migration assay data from panel (A). n = 10–12 zebrafish embryos per treatment group.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Neutrophil migration assay in the Tg(lysC:dsRed) transgenic zebrafish.
(A) In the control, neutrophils are localized around the vascular niche of the caudal hematopoietic tissue (CHT) at resting state during normal development in transgenic Tg(lysC:dsRed) zebrafish. Activation of neutrophils, i.e., by the Mint e-liquid promotes migration from the vascular niche of the CHT, a well-known hallmark for a pro-inflammatory response. (B) Pattern analysis, i.e., the summation of all Nearest Neighbor Distances, is an indicator of dispersed neutrophils. Boxes in (A) indicate the posterior trunk/tail region of zebrafish embryos. (C) Quantification of the neutrophil migration assay data from panel (A). n = 10–12 zebrafish embryos per treatment group.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. E-liquid exposures result in pro-inflammatory responses in zebrafish embryos.
(A) Pro-inflammatory responses with increases in neutrophil migration in transgenic Tg(lyscC:dsRed) zebrafish embryos are observed after exposures (3 dpf to 5 dpf) to Virginia Tobacco (VT), Menthol and Mint e-liquids or the known pro-inflammatory chemicals DSS or TNBS. Fluorescent neutrophils were imaged and analyzed using ImageXpress Pico. (B) The cell distance indicates the total nearest neighbor distances from neutrophils in the posterior trunk/tail regions of the transgenic Tg(lysC:dsRed) zebrafish at 5 dpf. n = 10–12 zebrafish embryos per treatment group. # p<0.001; * p<0.0001.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. E-liquid exposures result in pro-inflammatory responses in zebrafish embryos.
(A) Pro-inflammatory responses with increases in neutrophil migration in transgenic Tg(lyscC:dsRed) zebrafish embryos are observed after exposures (3 dpf to 5 dpf) to Virginia Tobacco (VT), Menthol and Mint e-liquids or the known pro-inflammatory chemicals DSS or TNBS. Fluorescent neutrophils were imaged and analyzed using ImageXpress Pico. (B) The cell distance indicates the total nearest neighbor distances from neutrophils in the posterior trunk/tail regions of the transgenic Tg(lysC:dsRed) zebrafish at 5 dpf. n = 10–12 zebrafish embryos per treatment group. # p<0.001; * p<0.0001.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Chronic vaping contributes to increased pulmonary pathology in mice infected with MHV-A59.
(A) Study design. (B) Inflammatory cytokine analysis of BAL fluid from mock-, PG/VG alone-, PG/VG + NIC alone-, “Mint” vape alone-, mock + MHV-, PG/VG + MHV-, PG/VG + NIC + MHV-, “Mint” vape + MHV-treated mice (compared with mock control). ANOVA was performed for multi-group comparisons (Tukey’s multiple comparison tests). Symbols and bars represent the mean ±SEM compared with the mock control (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.005, ****p<0.001). N.S., not significant. (C) H&E staining of lung tissue sections isolated from mock-, PG/VG alone-, PG/VG + NIC alone-, “Mint” vape alone-, mock + MHV-, PG/VG + MHV-, PG/VG + NIC + MHV-, “Mint” vape + MHV-treated mice. Alveolar wall thickening and the infiltration of inflammatory cells into the interstitial spaces were particularly observable in the lungs from the MHV-alone and vape + MHV mice (indicated by arrows). 200× magnification. Images are representative of five images examined per lung. NIC = 33 mg/ml nicotine
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Chronic vaping contributes to increased pulmonary pathology in mice infected with MHV-A59.
(A) Study design. (B) Inflammatory cytokine analysis of BAL fluid from mock-, PG/VG alone-, PG/VG + NIC alone-, “Mint” vape alone-, mock + MHV-, PG/VG + MHV-, PG/VG + NIC + MHV-, “Mint” vape + MHV-treated mice (compared with mock control). ANOVA was performed for multi-group comparisons (Tukey’s multiple comparison tests). Symbols and bars represent the mean ±SEM compared with the mock control (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.005, ****p<0.001). N.S., not significant. (C) H&E staining of lung tissue sections isolated from mock-, PG/VG alone-, PG/VG + NIC alone-, “Mint” vape alone-, mock + MHV-, PG/VG + MHV-, PG/VG + NIC + MHV-, “Mint” vape + MHV-treated mice. Alveolar wall thickening and the infiltration of inflammatory cells into the interstitial spaces were particularly observable in the lungs from the MHV-alone and vape + MHV mice (indicated by arrows). 200× magnification. Images are representative of five images examined per lung. NIC = 33 mg/ml nicotine
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Chronic vaping contributes to increased pulmonary pathology in mice infected with MHV-A59.
(A) Study design. (B) Inflammatory cytokine analysis of BAL fluid from mock-, PG/VG alone-, PG/VG + NIC alone-, “Mint” vape alone-, mock + MHV-, PG/VG + MHV-, PG/VG + NIC + MHV-, “Mint” vape + MHV-treated mice (compared with mock control). ANOVA was performed for multi-group comparisons (Tukey’s multiple comparison tests). Symbols and bars represent the mean ±SEM compared with the mock control (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.005, ****p<0.001). N.S., not significant. (C) H&E staining of lung tissue sections isolated from mock-, PG/VG alone-, PG/VG + NIC alone-, “Mint” vape alone-, mock + MHV-, PG/VG + MHV-, PG/VG + NIC + MHV-, “Mint” vape + MHV-treated mice. Alveolar wall thickening and the infiltration of inflammatory cells into the interstitial spaces were particularly observable in the lungs from the MHV-alone and vape + MHV mice (indicated by arrows). 200× magnification. Images are representative of five images examined per lung. NIC = 33 mg/ml nicotine
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Model for the 2-Stage in vivo Screening Platform: Zebrafish to Mouse.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sassano MF, Ghosh A, Tarran R, Tobacco Smoke Constituents Trigger Cytoplasmic Calcium Release. Appl In Vitro Toxicol 3, 193–198 (2017). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sassano MF et al., Evaluation of e-liquid toxicity using an open-source high-throughput screening assay. PLoS biology 16, e2003904 (2018). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davis ES, Sassano MF, Goodell H, Tarran R, E-Liquid Autofluorescence can be used as a Marker of Vaping Deposition and Third-Hand Vape Exposure. Scientific reports 7, 7459 (2017). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Etter JF, Bullen C, Saliva cotinine levels in users of electronic cigarettes. The European respiratory journal 38, 1219–1220 (2011). - PubMed
    1. Riker CA, Lee K, Darville A, Hahn EJ, E-cigarettes: promise or peril? The Nursing clinics of North America 47, 159–171 (2012). - PubMed