Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 May 2;8(2):e36948.
doi: 10.2196/36948.

Use of the CPD-REACTION Questionnaire to Evaluate Continuing Professional Development Activities for Health Professionals: Systematic Review

Gloria Ayivi-Vinz  1   2   3 , Felly Bakwa Kanyinga  1   2   3 , Lysa Bergeron  2 , Simon Décary  4 , Évèhouénou Lionel Adisso  1   2   3 , Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun  1   5 , Sam J Daniel  6 , Martin Tremblay  6 , Karine V Plourde  1   2 , Sabrina Guay-Bélanger  1   2 , France Légaré  1   2   5   7
Affiliations
Review

Use of the CPD-REACTION Questionnaire to Evaluate Continuing Professional Development Activities for Health Professionals: Systematic Review

Gloria Ayivi-Vinz et al. JMIR Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Continuing professional development (CPD) is essential for physicians to maintain and enhance their knowledge, competence, skills, and performance. Web-based CPD plays an essential role. However, validated theory-informed measures of their impact are lacking. The CPD-REACTION questionnaire is a validated theory-informed tool that evaluates the impact of CPD activities on clinicians' behavioral intentions.

Objective: We aimed to review the use of the CPD-REACTION questionnaire, which measures the impact of CPD activities on health professionals' intentions to change clinical behavior. We examined CPD activity characteristics, ranges of intention, mean scores, score distributions, and psychometric properties.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review informed by the Cochrane review methodology. We searched 8 databases from January 1, 2014, to April 20, 2021. Gray literature was identified using Google Scholar and Research Gate. Eligibility criteria included all health care professionals, any study design, and participants' completion of the CPD-REACTION questionnaire either before, after, or before and after a CPD activity. Study selection, data extraction, and study quality evaluation were independently performed by 2 reviewers. We extracted data on characteristics of studies, the CPD activity (eg, targeted clinical behavior and format), and CPD-REACTION use. We used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies. Data extracted were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Student t test (2-tailed) for bivariate analysis. The results are presented as a narrative synthesis reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.

Results: Overall, 65 citations were eligible and referred to 52 primary studies. The number of primary studies reporting the use of CPD-REACTION has increased continuously since 2014 from 1 to 16 publications per year (2021). It is available in English, French, Spanish, and Dutch. Most of the studies were conducted in Canada (30/52, 58%). Furthermore, 40 different clinical behaviors were identified. The most common CPD format was e-learning (34/52, 65%). The original version of the CPD-REACTION questionnaire was used in 31 of 52 studies, and an adapted version in 18 of 52 studies. In addition, 31% (16/52) of the studies measured both the pre- and postintervention scores. In 22 studies, CPD providers were university-based. Most studies targeted interprofessional groups of health professionals (31/52, 60%).

Conclusions: The use of CPD-REACTION has increased rapidly and across a wide range of clinical behaviors and formats, including a web-based format. Further research should investigate the most effective way to adapt the CPD-REACTION questionnaire to a variety of clinical behaviors and contexts.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42018116492; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=116492.

Keywords: CPD-REACTION; behavior; continuing; continuing professional development; education medical; health care professionals; intention; questionnaire; web-based.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 flowchart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of published studies worldwide that used the CPD-REACTION questionnaire.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Boxplot of number of participants by health profession present at each continuing professional development activity.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Sargeant J, Bruce D, Campbell CM. Practicing physicians' needs for assessment and feedback as part of professional development. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2013;33 Suppl 1:S54–62. doi: 10.1002/chp.21202. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chichirez CM, Purcărea VL. Health marketing and behavioral change: a review of the literature. J Med Life. 2018;11(1):15–9. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29696059 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. Evaluating training programs: the four levels. 3rd edition. San Francisco, CA, USA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2006.
    1. Légaré F, Borduas F, Jacques A, Laprise R, Voyer G, Boucher A, Luconi F, Rousseau M, Labrecque M, Sargeant J, Grimshaw J, Godin G. Developing a theory-based instrument to assess the impact of continuing professional development activities on clinical practice: a study protocol. Implement Sci. 2011 Mar 07;6:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-17. https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1748-59... 1748-5908-6-17 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Godin G, Bélanger-Gravel A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Healthcare professionals' intentions and behaviours: a systematic review of studies based on social cognitive theories. Implement Sci. 2008 Jul 16;3:36. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-36. https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1748-59... 1748-5908-3-36 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed