Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 22;12(1):4920.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08820-x.

Psychometric investigation of the gamification Hexad user types scale in Brazilian Portuguese

Affiliations

Psychometric investigation of the gamification Hexad user types scale in Brazilian Portuguese

Ana Cláudia Guimarães Santos et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Gamification has become a significant direction in designing technologies, services, products, organizational structures, and any human activities towards being more game-like and consequently being more engaging and motivating. Albeit its success, research indicates that personal differences exist with regards to susceptibility to gamification at large as well as to different types of gamification designs. As a response, models and measurement instruments of user types when it comes to gamification have been developed. One of the most discussed related instruments is the Hexad user types scale. However, there has been paucity of research related to the validity and reliability of the Hexad instrument in general but also of its different formulations and language versions. To face this gap, our study focused on analyzing the psychometric properties of the Hexad scale in Brazilian Portuguese by conducting two confirmatory factor analyses and two multi-group confirmatory factor analyses. The survey was answered by 421 Brazilian respondents (52% self-reported women, 47% self-reported men, 0.5% preferred not to provide their gender, and 0.5% checked the option "other"), from the five Brazilian regions (23 different states and the Federal District), and aged between 10 and 60 years old. Findings support the structural validity of the scale as an oblique model and indicate opportunities for small improvements. Further research, both at academy and practice, may use this study as the source of measurement of user types related to gamification (in Brazilian Portuguese), as well as, as a theoretical and practical source for further studies discussing personalized gamification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Path model (adapted from Tondello et al.). The ellipses represent the factors and the rectangles represent the items of the scale.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Path model with correlations between the factors. The ellipses represent the factors and the rectangles represent the items of the scale. *** p<0.001. The variance in each factor is defined in 1 by JASP. All parameters were freely estimated in the analysis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hamari, J. Gamification, chap. Gamification, 1–3 (The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, 2019).
    1. Koivisto J, Hamari J. The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification research. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019;45:191–210. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.013. - DOI
    1. Seaborn K, Fels D. Gamification in theory and action: A survey. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 2015;74:14–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006. - DOI
    1. Klock, A. C. T., Gasparini, I., Pimenta, M. S. & Hamari, J. Tailored gamification: A review of literature. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.144, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102495 (2020). - PubMed
    1. Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. Does gamification work?—A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci. 3025–3034. 10.1109/HICSS.2014.377 (2014).

Publication types