Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;29(6):1571-1586.
doi: 10.1111/ene.15267. Epub 2022 Mar 23.

European Academy of Neurology guidance for developing and reporting clinical practice guidelines on rare neurological diseases

Affiliations

European Academy of Neurology guidance for developing and reporting clinical practice guidelines on rare neurological diseases

Katina Aleksovska et al. Eur J Neurol. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Rare diseases affect up to 29 million people in the European Union, and almost 50% of them affect the nervous system or muscles. Delays in diagnosis and treatment onset and insufficient treatment choices are common. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) may improve the diagnosis and treatment of patients and optimize care pathways, delivering the best scientific evidence to all clinicians treating these patients. Recommendations are set for developing and reporting high-quality CPGs on rare neurological diseases (RNDs) within the European Academy of Neurology (EAN), through a consensus procedure.

Methods: A group of 27 experts generated an initial list of items that were evaluated through a two-step Delphi consensus procedure and a face-to-face meeting. The final list of items was reviewed by an external review group of 58 members.

Results: The consensus procedure yielded 63 final items. Items are listed according to the domains of the AGREE instruments and concern scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigour of development, and applicability. Additional items consider reporting and ethical issues. Recommendations are supported by practical examples derived from published guidelines and are presented in two tables: (1) items specific to RND CPGs, and general guideline items of special importance for RNDs, or often neglected; (2) items for guideline development within the EAN.

Conclusions: This guidance aims to provide solutions to the issues specific to RNDs. This consensus document, produced by many experts in various fields, is considered to serve as a starting point for further harmonization and for increasing the quality of CPGs in the field of RNDs.

Keywords: AGREE; Delphi; consensus; guideline; neurology; rare diseases; recommendation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Rare Diseases. Europe’s Challenges, (2009/C 151/02), published on 11.11.08. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph threats/non com/docs/rare com en.pdf
    1. Federico A. Rare neurological diseases: a Pandora's box for neurology (an European and Italian perspective). Rev Neurol (Paris). 2013;169(Suppl 1):S12-S17.
    1. Molster C, Urwin D, Di Pietro L, et al. Survey of healthcare experiences of Australian adults living with rare diseases. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016;11:30.
    1. Rath A, Salamon V, Peixoto S, et al. A systematic literature review of evidence-based clinical practice for rare diseases: what are the perceived and real barriers for improving the evidence and how can they be overcome? Trials. 2017;18:56.
    1. Blöß S, Klemann C, Rother A-K, et al. Diagnostic needs for rare diseases and shared prediagnostic phenomena: results of a German-wide expert Delphi survey. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0172532.

LinkOut - more resources