Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Based Calcium Scoring: In Vitro and In Vivo Validation of a Novel Virtual Noniodine Reconstruction Algorithm on a Clinical, First-Generation Dual-Source Photon Counting-Detector System
- PMID: 35318969
- DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000868
Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Based Calcium Scoring: In Vitro and In Vivo Validation of a Novel Virtual Noniodine Reconstruction Algorithm on a Clinical, First-Generation Dual-Source Photon Counting-Detector System
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-based in vitro and in vivo coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) using a novel virtual noniodine reconstruction (PureCalcium) on a clinical first-generation photon-counting detector-computed tomography system compared with virtual noncontrast (VNC) reconstructions and true noncontrast (TNC) acquisitions.
Materials and methods: Although CACS and CCTA are well-established techniques for the assessment of coronary artery disease, they are complementary acquisitions, translating into increased scan time and patient radiation dose. Hence, accurate CACS derived from a single CCTA acquisition would be highly desirable. In this study, CACS based on PureCalcium, VNC, and TNC, reconstructions was evaluated in a CACS phantom and in 67 patients (70 [59/80] years, 58.2% male) undergoing CCTA on a first-generation photon counting detector-computed tomography system. Coronary artery calcium scores were quantified for the 3 reconstructions and compared using Wilcoxon test. Agreement was evaluated by Pearson and Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. Classification of coronary artery calcium score categories (0, 1-10, 11-100, 101-400, and >400) was compared using Cohen κ .
Results: Phantom studies demonstrated strong agreement between CACS PureCalcium and CACS TNC (60.7 ± 90.6 vs 67.3 ± 88.3, P = 0.01, r = 0.98, intraclass correlation [ICC] = 0.98; mean bias, 6.6; limits of agreement [LoA], -39.8/26.6), whereas CACS VNC showed a significant underestimation (42.4 ± 75.3 vs 67.3 ± 88.3, P < 0.001, r = 0.94, ICC = 0.89; mean bias, 24.9; LoA, -87.1/37.2). In vivo comparison confirmed a high correlation but revealed an underestimation of CACS PureCalcium (169.3 [0.7/969.4] vs 232.2 [26.5/1112.2], P < 0.001, r = 0.97, ICC = 0.98; mean bias, -113.5; LoA, -470.2/243.2). In comparison, CACS VNC showed a similarly high correlation, but a substantially larger underestimation (24.3 [0/272.3] vs 232.2 [26.5/1112.2], P < 0.001, r = 0.97, ICC = 0.54; mean bias, -551.6; LoA, -2037.5/934.4). CACS PureCalcium showed superior agreement of CACS classification ( κ = 0.88) than CACS VNC ( κ = 0.60).
Conclusions: The accuracy of CACS quantification and classification based on PureCalcium reconstructions of CCTA outperforms CACS derived from VNC reconstructions.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: U. Joseph Schoepf receives institutional research support and / or personal fees from Bayer, Bracco, Elucid Bioimaging, Guerbet, HeartFlow, and Siemens. Akos Varga-Szemes receives institutional research support and / or personal fees from Elucid Bioimaging and Siemens. Tilman Emrich received a speaker fee and travel support from Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc. Jim O’Doherty is a employee of Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc. Thomas Allmendinger, Tristan Nowak, Bernhard Schmidt and Thomas Flohr are employees of Siemens Healthineers
References
-
- Divakaran S, Cheezum MK, Hulten EA, et al. Use of cardiac CT and calcium scoring for detecting coronary plaque: implications on prognosis and patient management. Br J Radiol . 2015;88:20140594.
-
- Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Coronary Syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J . 2020;41:407–477. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425 . - DOI
-
- Moss AJ, Williams MC, Newby DE, et al. The updated NICE guidelines: cardiac CT as the first-line test for coronary artery disease. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep . 2017;10:15. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28446943 .
-
- Schwarz F, Nance JWJ, Ruzsics B, et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium on the basis of dual-energy coronary CT angiography. Radiology . 2012;264:700–707.
-
- Gassert FG, Schacky CE, Müller-Leisse C, et al. Calcium scoring using virtual non-contrast images from a dual-layer spectral detector CT: comparison to true non-contrast data and evaluation of proportionality factor in a large patient collective. Eur Radiol . 2021;31:6193–6199.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous