Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;17(3):42-48.
doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2022.26729.

Health Services and Policy Research in Canada: An Editor's Reflections

Affiliations

Health Services and Policy Research in Canada: An Editor's Reflections

Joel Lexchin. Healthc Policy. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Starting in 2017, retroactive to 2016, Innovative Medicines Canada (IMC) - the lobby group representing most of the large research-based pharmaceutical companies operating in Canada - initiated a voluntary system for companies to annually report on payments that they make to healthcare providers and organizations. Over the five years that the system has been in operation, 10 companies reported spending almost $345 million. The largest payments were to healthcare providers. Four companies spent more than $10 million in one or more years. The names of people and organizations receiving the payments and their purpose are not disclosed. Even if IMC makes disclosures mandatory for all its members, those reforms will not be enough to ensure transparency of company payments.

Depuis 2017, avec effet rétroactif sur 2016, Médicaments novateurs Canada (MNC) – le lobby représentant la plupart des grandes entreprises de recherche pharmaceutique en activité au Canada – propose aux entreprises un système volontaire de déclaration annuelle des paiements qu'elles versent aux fournisseurs et aux organismes de santé. Au cours des cinq années de fonctionnement du système, 10 entreprises ont déclaré avoir dépensé près de 345 millions de dollars. Les paiements les plus importants étaient destinés aux fournisseurs de soins de santé. Quatre entreprises ont dépensé plus de 10 millions de dollars en une ou plusieurs années. Les noms des personnes et des organisations recevant les paiements ne sont pas divulgués, pas plus que ne le sont les objectifs visés. Même si MNC rendait les divulgations obligatoires pour tous ses membres, ces réformes ne suffiraient pas à assurer la transparence des paiements des entreprises.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. De Jong C., Aguiilar T., Tseng C.-W., Lin G.A., Boscardin W.J., Dudley R.A.. 2016. Pharmaceutical Industry-Sponsored Meals and Physician Prescribing Patterns for Medicare Beneficiaries. JAMA Internal Medicine 176(8): 1114–22. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2765. - PubMed
    1. Fleischman W., Agrawal S., King M., Venkatesh A.K., Krumholz H.M., McKee D. et al. 2016. Association between Payments from Manufacturers of Pharmaceuticals to Physicians and Regional Prescribing: Cross Sectional Ecological Study. BMJ 354: i4189. doi:10.1136/bmj.i4189. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grant K. 2017, June 20. Canadian Drug Makers Assailed for Lack of Transparency over Payments. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved June 21, 2017. <https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/canadian-drug-makers-assai...>.
    1. Grundy Q., Habibi R., Shnier A., Mayes C., Lipworth W.. 2018. Decoding Disclosure: Comparing Conflict of Interest Policy among the United States, France, and Australia. Health Policy 122(5): 509–18. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.03.015. - PubMed
    1. Hoskins E. 2017. Bill 160 (Chapter 25 of the Statutes of Ontario, 2017): An Act to Amend, Repeal and Enact Various Acts in the Interest of Strengthening Quality and Acccountability for Patients. Legislative Assembly of Ontario. Retrieved October 20, 2021. <https://www.ola.org/sites/default/files/node-files/bill/document/pdf/201...>.

LinkOut - more resources