Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 31;9(2):e35380.
doi: 10.2196/35380.

Digital Health Opportunities to Improve Primary Health Care in the Context of COVID-19: Scoping Review

Cícera Renata Diniz Vieira Silva #  1 , Rayssa Horácio Lopes  2 , Osvaldo de Goes Bay Jr  3 , Claudia Santos Martiniano  4 , Miguel Fuentealba-Torres  5 , Ricardo Alexandre Arcêncio  6 , Luís Velez Lapão  7   8 , Sonia Dias  9 , Severina Alice da Costa Uchoa  2
Affiliations

Digital Health Opportunities to Improve Primary Health Care in the Context of COVID-19: Scoping Review

Cícera Renata Diniz Vieira Silva et al. JMIR Hum Factors. .

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic brought social, economic, and health impacts, requiring fast adaptation of health systems. Although information and communication technologies were essential for achieving this objective, the extent to which health systems incorporated this technology is unknown.

Objective: The aim of this study was to map the use of digital health strategies in primary health care worldwide and their impact on quality of care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: We performed a scoping review based on the Joanna Briggs Institute manual and guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) Extension for Scoping Reviews. A systematic and comprehensive three-step search was performed in June and July 2021 in multidisciplinary health science databases and the gray literature. Data extraction and eligibility were performed by two authors independently and interpreted using thematic analysis.

Results: A total of 44 studies were included and six thematic groups were identified: characterization and geographic distribution of studies; nomenclatures of digital strategies adopted; types of information and communication technologies; characteristics of digital strategies in primary health care; impacts on quality of care; and benefits, limitations, and challenges of digital strategies in primary health care. The impacts on organization of quality of care were investigated by the majority of studies, demonstrating the strengthening of (1) continuity of care; (2) economic, social, geographical, time, and cultural accessibility; (3) coordination of care; (4) access; (5) integrality of care; (6) optimization of appointment time; (7) and efficiency. Negative impacts were also observed in the same dimensions, such as reduced access to services and increased inequity and unequal use of services offered, digital exclusion of part of the population, lack of planning for defining the role of professionals, disarticulation of actions with real needs of the population, fragile articulation between remote and face-to-face modalities, and unpreparedness of professionals to meet demands using digital technologies.

Conclusions: The results showed the positive and negative impacts of remote strategies on quality of care in primary care and the inability to take advantage of the potential of technologies. This may demonstrate differences in the organization of fast and urgent implementation of digital strategies in primary health care worldwide. Primary health care must strengthen its response capacity, expand the use of information and communication technologies, and manage challenges using scientific evidence since digital health is important and must be integrated into public service.

Keywords: COVID-19; digital health; gray literature; pandemic; primary health care; quality of care; science database; telehealth; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study selection for scoping review adapted from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of countries that used digital strategies in primary health care. Numbers represent the number of studies performed in each country.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Word cloud with nomenclatures used to refer to digital strategies in primary health care.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Characteristics of remote strategies in primary health care.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine . Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. - PubMed
    1. Donabedian A. An introduction to quality assurance in health care. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002. Epigenomics.
    1. Champagne F, Hartz Z, Brousselle A. A apreciação normativa. In: Brousselle A, Champagne F, Contradriopoulos AP, Hartz Z, editors. Avaliação: conceitos e métodos. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Fiocruz; 2011. pp. 77–94.
    1. Donabedian A. Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring: the definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press; 1980.
    1. Rawaf S, Allen LN, Stigler FL, Kringos D, Quezada Yamamoto H, van Weel C, Global Forum on Universal Health Coverage Primary Health Care Lessons on the COVID-19 pandemic, for and by primary care professionals worldwide. Eur J Gen Pract. 2020 Dec;26(1):129–133. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2020.1820479. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32985278 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources