Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 23;17(3):e0265726.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265726. eCollection 2022.

Development of a national quality framework for palliative care in a mixed generalist and specialist care model: A whole-sector approach and a modified Delphi technique

Affiliations
Review

Development of a national quality framework for palliative care in a mixed generalist and specialist care model: A whole-sector approach and a modified Delphi technique

Manon S Boddaert et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

In a predominantly biomedical healthcare model focused on cure, providing optimal, person-centred palliative care is challenging. The general public, patients, and healthcare professionals are often unaware of palliative care's benefits. Poor interdisciplinary teamwork and limited communication combined with a lack of early identification of patients with palliative care needs contribute to sub-optimal palliative care provision. We aimed to develop a national quality framework to improve availability and access to high-quality palliative care in a mixed generalist-specialist palliative care model. We hypothesised that a whole-sector approach and a modified Delphi technique would be suitable to reach this aim. Analogous to the international AGREE guideline criteria and employing a whole-sector approach, an expert panel comprising mandated representatives for patients and their families, various healthcare associations, and health insurers answered the main question: 'What are the elements defining high-quality palliative care in the Netherlands?'. For constructing the quality framework, a bottleneck analysis of palliative care provision and a literature review were conducted. Six core documents were used in a modified Delphi technique to build the framework with the expert panel, while stakeholder organisations were involved and informed in round-table discussions. In the entire process, preparing and building relationships took one year and surveying, convening, discussing content, consulting peers, and obtaining final consent from all stakeholders took 18 months. A quality framework, including a glossary of terms, endorsed by organisations representing patients and their families, general practitioners, elderly care physicians, medical specialists, nurses, social workers, psychologists, spiritual caregivers, and health insurers was developed and annexed with a summary for patients and families. We successfully developed a national consensus-based patient-centred quality framework for high-quality palliative care in a mixed generalist-specialist palliative care model. A whole-sector approach and a modified Delphi technique are feasible structures to achieve this aim. The process we reported may guide other countries in their initiatives to enhance palliative care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: CCDR declares receiving fees from Kyowa Kirin for consulting activities outside the submitted work and paid to her department. The other authors have declared that no competing interests exist. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Structure and process to develop the quality framework.
Letters a-j refer to subheadings in text.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Flow diagram for the review of international literature.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Palliative care as defined in the quality framework (adapted from WHO, 2002).
Fig 4
Fig 4. Developing the content of the quality framework including a glossary of terms.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sepulveda C, Marlin A, Yoshida T, Ullrich A. Palliative Care: the World Health Organization’s global perspective. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002;24(2):91–6. Epub 2002/09/17. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00440-2 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Henderson JD, Boyle A, Herx L, Alexiadis A, Barwich D, Connidis S, et al.. Staffing a Specialist Palliative Care Service, a Team-Based Approach: Expert Consensus White Paper. J Palliat Med. 2019;22(11):1318–23. Epub 2019/07/28. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0314 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quill TE, Abernethy AP. Generalist plus specialist palliative care—creating a more sustainable model. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(13):1173–5. Epub 2013/03/08. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1215620 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hui D, Hannon BL, Zimmermann C, Bruera E. Improving patient and caregiver outcomes in oncology: Team-based, timely, and targeted palliative care. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(5):356–76. Epub 2018/10/03. doi: 10.3322/caac.21490 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6179926. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hui D, Bruera E. Models of Palliative Care Delivery for Patients With Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(9):852–65. Epub 2020/02/06. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02123 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7082156. - DOI - PMC - PubMed