Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 25;52(2):150-160.
doi: 10.4041/kjod.2022.52.2.150.

Customized maxillary incisor position relative to dentoskeletal and soft tissue patterns in Chinese women: A retrospective study

Affiliations

Customized maxillary incisor position relative to dentoskeletal and soft tissue patterns in Chinese women: A retrospective study

Xueman Zhou et al. Korean J Orthod. .

Abstract

Objective: To provide reliable prediction models based on dentoskeletal and soft tissue variables for customizing maxillary incisor positions and to optimize digitalized orthodontic treatment planning.

Methods: This study included 244 Chinese women (age, 18-40 years old) with esthetic profiles after orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances (133 in group I: 1° ≤ The angle between the nasion [N]-A point [A] plane and the N-B point [B] plane [ANB] ≤ 4°; 111 in group II: 4° < ANB ≤ 7°). Dental, skeletal, and soft tissue measurements were performed on lateral cephalograms of the participants. Correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were used to determine the influence of dentoskeletal and soft tissue variables on maxillary incisor position.

Results: The ideal anteroposterior position of the maxillary incisor varied between sagittal skeletal patterns. The position of the maxillary incisor correlated with the sagittal discrepancy between the maxilla and the mandible (ANB), protrusion of the midface, nasal tip projection, development of the chin, and inclination of both the maxillary and mandibular incisors. Distance from the maxillary central incisor to nasion-pogonion plane predicted using multiple linear regression analysis was accurate and could be a practical measurement in orthodontic treatment planning.

Conclusions: Instead of using an average value or norm, orthodontists should customize a patient's ideal maxillary incisor position using dentoskeletal and soft tissue evaluations.

Keywords: Cephalometrics; Customized maxillary incisor position; Dentoskeletal and soft tissue patterns; Mathematical approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Reference planes and landmarks used in this study. Reference planes: Frankfort horizontal plane (FH), a plane passing through the porion and orbitale; Esthetic plane (EP), a plane passing through the pronasale and tangent to the chin; Mandibular plane (MP), a plane passing through the menton and tangent to the posterior portion of the lower border of the mandible; Np, a line passing through the nasion and perpendicular to the FH plane; Ap, a line passing through the A point and perpendicular to the FH plane; G’ vert, a line passing through the glabella and perpendicular to the FH plane; Sn vert, a line passing through the subnasale and perpendicular to the FH plane. Landmarks: S, sella; N, nation; Or, orbitale; P, porion; Go, gonion; A, A point; B, B point; Pog, pogonion; Me, menton; ANS, anterior nasal spine; PNS, posterior nasal spine; Prn, pronasale; Sn, subnasale; Ls, labrale superius; Li, labrale inferius; G’, glabella; Pog’, pogonion of soft tissue; Me’, menton of soft tissue.

References

    1. Hayashida H, Ioi H, Nakata S, Takahashi I, Counts AL. Effects of retraction of anterior teeth and initial soft tissue variables on lip changes in Japanese adults. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:419–26. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq095. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lu W, Zhang X, Mei L, Wang P, He J, Li Y, et al. Orthodontic incisor retraction caused changes in the soft tissue chin area: a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20:108. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01099-2.fc4f4769b9134a62b239f59df8d574ff - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tweed CH. The Frankfort-mandibular plane angle in orthodontic diagnosis, classification, treatment planning, and prognosis. Am J Orthod Oral Surg. 1946;32:175–230. doi: 10.1016/0096-6347(46)90001-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Downs WB. Variations in facial relationships; their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod. 1948;34:812–40. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(48)90015-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Steiner C. The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment: report of a case. Am J Orthod. 1960;46:721–35. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(60)90145-7. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources