HemosIL VWF:GPIbR Assay Has a Greater Sensitivity than VWF:RCo Technique to Detect Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Abstract

Background: Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) is frequent in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). For von Willebrand factor (VWF) functional evaluation, ristocetin cofactor activity by aggregometry (VWF:RCo) is considered the gold standard but has limitations, and automated activity measurement has been developed such as the HemosIL VWF:RCo Werfen with particle agglutination (VWF:GPIbR).

Objectives: To evaluate the performance of VWF:GPIbR with HemosIL VWF:RCo Werfen (VWF:GPIbR) versus VWF:RCo in patients with thrombocytosis in the context of MPNs (T-MPNs) and in patients with secondary thrombocytosis (ST).

Methods: MPN patients with thrombocytosis >450 G/L (T-MPNs) were compared with patients with ST due to inflammation or iron deficiency. VWF activity (VWF:Act) was analyzed using VWF:RCo or VWF:GPIbR. VWF analysis was completed by analysis of VWF multimers and VWF collagen binding (CB) assay (VWF:CB).

Results: A total of 33 T-MPNs and 18 ST patients were included. Compared with aggregometry, evaluation of VWF:Act by VWF:GPIbR led to lower values in T-MPN patients, but also in ST patients. Interestingly, although the VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio did not reveal differences between T-MPNs and ST patients, the VWF:GPIbR/VWF:Ag ratio analysis allowed us to suspect AVWS only in T-MPN patients. Using the distribution of VWF multimer analysis and VWF:CB, we here demonstrated that VWF:GPIbR allows AVWS diagnosis in nine T-MPNs as opposed to aggregometry.

Conclusion: Evaluation of VWF:Act using VWF:GPIbR has a greater sensitivity compared with aggregometry to detect AVWS in T-MPN patients.