Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;49(8):732-739.
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13618. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

Intra- and inter-examiner reliability in classifying periodontitis according to the 2018 classification of periodontal diseases

Affiliations

Intra- and inter-examiner reliability in classifying periodontitis according to the 2018 classification of periodontal diseases

Lory Abrahamian et al. J Clin Periodontol. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the inter-examiner reliability in classifying periodontitis using the 2018 classification of periodontal diseases, when used by postgraduate students, academics, and specialist clinicians trained in European Federation of Periodontology (EFP) and American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) postgraduate-accredited programmes.

Materials and methods: An online survey including five patients with periodontitis was sent twice to seven specialists in periodontology to provide the staging and grading characteristics. After agreeing on a "gold-standard" classification, the same questionnaire was sent to 16 EFP and 73 AAP postgraduate programmes, to be answered by their faculty, graduates, and students. The responses were compared with the gold-standard classification, and the inter-examiner agreement was calculated.

Results: One-hundred and seventy-four participants completed the survey. The inter-examiner agreement resulted in 68.7% in assigning the stage, 82.4% in assigning the grade, and 75.5% in assigning the extent. The academic position and the experience of the participants did not have any significant influence on classifying periodontitis as the gold standard.

Conclusions: The use of the 2018 periodontitis classification resulted in high inter-examiner reliability when used by a specialist group of clinicians, postgraduate students, and academicians, irrespective of their current position and experience. Given the low response rate and potential selection bias, results pertaining to the use of this system in classifying periodontitis should be interpreted with caution.

Keywords: classification; diagnosis; periodontal diseases; periodontitis; survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interests related to the content of this manuscript.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Representative example of a case in the survey. FMBS, full‐mouth bleeding score; FMPS, full‐mouth plaque score

References

    1. Armitage, G. C. (1999). Development of a classification system for periodontal diseases and conditions. Annals of Periodontology, 4(1), 1–6. 10.1902/annals.1999.4.1.1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Armitage, G. C. (2014). AAP centennial commentary: Theme 3: Evolution and application of classification systems for periodontal diseases–A retrospective commentary. Journal of Periodontology, 85(3), 369–371. 10.1902/jop.2014.130700 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borrell, L. N. , & Papapanou, P. N. (2005). Analytical epidemiology of periodontitis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 32(Suppl. 6), 132–158. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00799.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caton, J. G. , Armitage, G. , Berglundh, T. , Chapple, I. L. C. , Jepsen, S. , Kornman, K. S. , Mealey, B. L. , Papapanou, P. N. , Sanz, M. , & Tonetti, M. S. (2018). A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri‐implant diseases and conditions—Introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 45 Suppl. 20, S1–S8. 10.1111/jcpe.12935 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohen, J. F. , Korevaar, D. A. , Altman, D. G. , Bruns, D. E. , Gatsonis, C. A. , Hooft, L. , Irwig, L. , Levine, D. , Reitsma, J. B. , de Vet, H. C. W. , & Bossuyt, P. M. M. (2016). STARD guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ Open, 6(11), 1–17. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012799 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types