In vivo full-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners: a narrative review
- PMID: 35322648
In vivo full-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners: a narrative review
Abstract
Aim: The present narrative review aims to provide an overview of the in vivo accuracy of full-arch scans performed with currently used intraoral devices and to compare different methods for the determination of in vivo accuracy. Materials and methods: An electronic search was performed with the PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science databases, including articles from 2015 to 2020. Specific search strategies were developed for each platform.
Results: The final search resulted in five published articles. The mean values of trueness and precision of the examined scanners ranged from 12.9 to 80.01 µm for trueness and from 42.9 to 86.0 µm for precision in full-arch dentition. Not all studies evaluated both trueness and precision. Furthermore, the methods and references for determining the in vivo accuracy proved to be very different.
Conclusion: To date, no scientific consensus on the required accuracy of in vivo full-arch scans has been reached and published. Due to the small number of studies on the in vivo accuracy of full-arch scans, further studies should be conducted in this area. In addition, a concept for a valid reference that can be scanned both extraorally and intraorally should be developed.
Keywords: accuracy; digital dentistry; digital impression; in vivo accuracy; intraoral scanner; optical impressions; CAD/CAM.
Similar articles
-
Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners.J Dent. 2022 Sep;124:104220. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104220. Epub 2022 Jul 8. J Dent. 2022. PMID: 35817227
-
Accuracy of intraoral scans: An in vivo study of different scanning devices.J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Dec;128(6):1303-1309. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 Apr 24. J Prosthet Dent. 2022. PMID: 33902891
-
A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients.J Dent. 2016 Dec;55:68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Oct 4. J Dent. 2016. PMID: 27717754
-
Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: A systematic review.Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2021 May 12;14(2):157-179. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2021. PMID: 34006079
-
Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review.J Prosthodont Res. 2020 Apr;64(2):109-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Aug 30. J Prosthodont Res. 2020. PMID: 31474576 Review.
Cited by
-
Influence of different dental scenarios on the accuracy of computerized optical impressions: an in vitro pilot study.Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Feb 28;29(3):162. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06245-0. Clin Oral Investig. 2025. PMID: 40016551 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Ultra-Low-Dose CBCT Protocols to Investigate Vestibular Bone Defects in the Context of Immediate Implant Planning: An Ex Vivo Study on Cadaver Skulls.J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 12;14(12):4196. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124196. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40565942 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of the Inter-Tooth Distance and Proximal Axial Wall Height of Prepared Teeth on the Scanning Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners.J Funct Biomater. 2024 Apr 25;15(5):115. doi: 10.3390/jfb15050115. J Funct Biomater. 2024. PMID: 38786627 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Analysis between 3D-Printed Models Designed with Generic and Dental-Specific Software.Dent J (Basel). 2023 Sep 14;11(9):216. doi: 10.3390/dj11090216. Dent J (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37754336 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous