Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 14;10(3):48.
doi: 10.3390/dj10030048.

Deep Margin Elevation: A Literature Review

Affiliations
Review

Deep Margin Elevation: A Literature Review

Theodora Kalliopi Samartzi et al. Dent J (Basel). .

Abstract

A conservative approach for restoring deep proximal lesions is to apply an increment of composite resin over the preexisting cervical margin to relocate it coronally, the so-called "deep margin elevation" (DME). A literature search for research articles referring to DME published from January 1998 until November 2021 was conducted using MEDLINE (PubMed), Ovid, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Semantic Scholar databases applying preset inclusion and exclusion criteria. Elevation material and adhesive system employed for luting seem to be significant factors concerning the marginal adaptation of the restoration. This technique does not affect bond strength, fatigue behavior, fracture resistance, failure pattern or repairability. DME and subgingival restorations are compatible with periodontal health, given that they are well-polished and refined. The available literature is limited mainly to in vitro studies. Therefore, randomized clinical trials with extended follow-up periods are necessary to clarify all aspects of the technique and ascertain its validity in clinical practice. For the time being, DME should be applied with caution respecting three criteria: capability of field isolation, the perfect seal of the cervical margin provided by the matrix, and no invasion of the connective compartment of biological width.

Keywords: cervical margin relocation; deep margin elevation; dental caries; proximal box elevation; subgingival margins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Process of final studies selection.

References

    1. Veneziani M. Adhesive restorations in the posterior area with subgingival cervical margins: New classification and differen-tiated treatment approach. Eur. J. Esthet. Dent. 2010;5:50–76. - PubMed
    1. Vertolli T.J., Martinsen B.D., Hanson C.M., Howard R.S., Kooistra S., Ye L. Effect of Deep Margin Elevation on CAD/CAM-Fabricated Ceramic Inlays. Oper. Dent. 2020;45:608–617. doi: 10.2341/18-315-L. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wassell R.W., Walls A.W., McCabe J.F. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: Three-year clinical results. Br. Dent. J. 1995;179:343–349. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808919. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hickel R., Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J. Adhes Dent. 2001;3:45–64. - PubMed
    1. Barone A., Derchi G., Rossi A., Marconcini S., Covani U. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of bonded composite inlays: A 3-year study. Quintessence Int. 2008;39:65–71. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources