Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 17;12(3):82.
doi: 10.3390/bs12030082.

Should Burnout Be Conceptualized as a Mental Disorder?

Lindsey Nadon  1 , Leon T De Beer  2 , Alexandre J S Morin  1
Affiliations
Review

Should Burnout Be Conceptualized as a Mental Disorder?

Lindsey Nadon et al. Behav Sci (Basel). .

Abstract

Burnout is generally acknowledged by researchers, clinicians, and the public as a pervasive occupational difficulty. Despite this widespread recognition, longstanding debates remain within the scientific community regarding its definition and the appropriateness of classifying burnout as its own pathological entity. The current review seeks to address whether burnout should (or could) be characterized as a distinctive mental disorder to shed light on this debate. After briefly reviewing the history, theoretical underpinnings, and measurement of burnout, we more systematically consider the current evidence for and against its classification as a mental disorder within existing diagnostic systems. Stemming from a lack of conceptual clarity, the current state of burnout research remains, unfortunately, largely circular and riddled with measurement issues. As a result, information regarding the unique biopsychosocial etiology, diagnostic features, differential diagnostic criteria, and prevalence rates of burnout are still lacking. Therefore, we conclude that it would be inappropriate, if not premature, to introduce burnout as a distinct mental disorder within any existing diagnostic classification system. We argue, however, that it would be equally premature to discard burnout as a psychologically relevant phenomenon and that current evidence does support its relevance as an important occupational syndrome. We finally offer several avenues for future research, calling for cross-national collaboration to clarify conceptual and measurement issues while avoiding the reification of outdated definitions. In doing so, we hope that it one day becomes possible to more systematically re-assess the relevance of burnout as a distinctive diagnostic category.

Keywords: burnout; conceptualization; diagnostic; mental disorder; syndrome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest in the publication of this article. The research funder had no role in the design, interpretation, writing, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

    1. Lepore J. Burnout: Modern Affliction or Human Condition? The New Yorker. 24 May 2021. [(accessed on 11 January 2022)]. Available online: www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/05/24/burnout-modern-affliction-or-human....
    1. Moss J. The Burnout Epidemic: The Rise of Chronic Stress and How We Can Fix It. Harvard Business Press; Boston, MA, USA: 2021.
    1. Maslach C., Leiter M.P. Understanding the burnout experience: Recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry. 2016;15:103–111. doi: 10.1002/wps.20311. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Freudenberger H.J. Staff Burn-Out. J. Soc. Issues. 1974;30:159–165. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.x. - DOI
    1. Freudenberger H.J. The staff burn-out syndrome in alternative institutions. Psychother. Theory Res. Pract. 1975;12:73–82. doi: 10.1037/h0086411. - DOI