Antipsychotic Exposure in Clinical High Risk of Psychosis: Empirical Insights From a Large Cohort Study
- PMID: 35324095
- DOI: 10.4088/JCP.21m14092
Antipsychotic Exposure in Clinical High Risk of Psychosis: Empirical Insights From a Large Cohort Study
Abstract
Objective: Current treatment guidelines for individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis do not recommend the prescription of antipsychotics (not even second-generation ones) as the first treatment option for preventing psychosis. Yet, recent meta-analytic evidence indicates that antipsychotic exposure in CHR is relatively widespread and associated with a higher imminent risk of transition to psychosis. Therefore, we undertook this study to better delineate which clinical characteristics of CHR individuals may lead to the choice of antipsychotic prescription and whether it identifies a subgroup at higher risk for conversion to psychosis.
Methods: Consecutively referred CHR individuals (N = 717) were assessed for demographic and clinical characteristics and followed up for 3 years (200 did not reach the end of the follow-up time) from 2016 to 2021. The sample was then dichotomized, on the basis of antipsychotic prescription, to prescribed (CHRAP+, n = 492) or not-prescribed (CHRAP-, n = 225) groups, which were subsequently compared for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. The risks of conversion to psychosis in CHRAP+ versus CHRAP- groups were tested via survival analysis.
Results: Of the 717 CHR individuals, 492 (68.62%) were prescribed antipsychotics; among these antipsychotics, the highest proportion used was for aripiprazole (n = 152), followed by olanzapine (n = 106), amisulpride (n = 76), and risperidone (n = 64). The CHRAP+ group had younger age (t = 2.138, P = .033), higher proportion of female individuals (χ2 = 5.084, P = .024), psychotic symptoms of greater severity (t = 7.910, P < .001), and more impaired general function (t = 5.846, P < .001) than the CHRAP- group. The CHRAP+ group had greater risk for conversion to psychosis (27.0% in the CHRAP+ group vs 10.9% in the CHRAP- group, P < .001). Factors related to positive symptoms were the most likely to influence doctors' decision-making regarding prescripton of antipsychotics, without influence of age, sex, and education levels.
Conclusions: Clinicians may prescribe antipsychotics mainly based on the severity of positive and disorganization symptoms of CHR individuals. The CHRAP+ group was associated with a higher risk of conversion to psychosis. In pragmatic terms, this finding indicates that baseline antipsychotic prescription in CHR cohorts is a warning flag for higher incipient risk of psychosis and designates as hyper-CHR subgroup as compared to antipsychotic-naive CHR.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04010864.
© Copyright 2022 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Atypical antipsychotics for psychosis in adolescents.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 15;2013(10):CD009582. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009582.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 24129841 Free PMC article.
-
Withdrawal versus continuation of chronic antipsychotic drugs for behavioural and psychological symptoms in older people with dementia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;(3):CD007726. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007726.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23543555
-
Olanzapine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;2010(3):CD006654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006654.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010. PMID: 20238348 Free PMC article.
-
Baseline benzodiazepine exposure is associated with greater risk of transition in clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR-P): a meta-analysis.Psychol Med. 2023 Oct;53(14):6417-6423. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723002180. Epub 2023 Aug 23. Psychol Med. 2023. PMID: 37609894
-
Risperidone versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;2011(1):CD006626. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006626.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. PMID: 21249678 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Increasing conceptual clarity and confounders identification: a pragmatic way to enhance prognostic precision in ENIGMA clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P).Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Jul;30(7):3319-3320. doi: 10.1038/s41380-025-02948-8. Epub 2025 Mar 17. Mol Psychiatry. 2025. PMID: 40097609 No abstract available.
-
The impact of aripiprazole on neurocognitive function in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis: A comparison with olanzapine and non-antipsychotic treatment.Eur Psychiatry. 2025 May 22;68(1):e69. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2459. Eur Psychiatry. 2025. PMID: 40401719 Free PMC article.
-
Racial differences in pathways to care preceding first episode mania or psychosis: a historical cohort prodromal study.Front Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 4;14:1241071. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1241071. eCollection 2023. Front Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 37732076 Free PMC article.
-
Baseline Exposure to Antipsychotic Medication in Young People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: A 2-Year Italian Follow-Up Study.Hum Psychopharmacol. 2025 Mar;40(2):e70003. doi: 10.1002/hup.70003. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2025. PMID: 39962036 Free PMC article.
-
A narrative literature review of white matter microstructure in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis.Psychoradiology. 2024 Dec 24;5:kkae031. doi: 10.1093/psyrad/kkae031. eCollection 2025. Psychoradiology. 2024. PMID: 40406529 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical