Engaging citizens in local health policymaking. A realist explorative case-study
- PMID: 35324975
- PMCID: PMC8946671
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265404
Engaging citizens in local health policymaking. A realist explorative case-study
Abstract
Background: Municipalities have been trying to involve citizens as citizen participation is thought to improve municipalities' accountability, the quality of services, and to align policies and services to communities' needs. This study examined citizens' participation preferences in policymaking by investigating their health policy priorities, expectations of involvement, and required support.
Methods: For this case-study the realist evaluation approach was applied to focus groups with citizens and to a workshop with a local panel consisting of professionals, citizens and citizen representatives.
Results: This study showed that citizens want to be involved in (health) policymaking with the aim of improving their communities' quality of life and living environment and prioritised local services and amenities (e.g. suitable housing, public transport, health and care services). Instead, professionals' priorities were focussed on singular public health issues related to prevention and lifestyle factors. The results also show that citizens felt responsible for driving citizen participation and representing community needs to the municipality, but needed the municipality to improve their communication and accessibility in order to do so successfully. Furthermore, the professionals on the panel indicated that they needed training on how to reach out to citizens. Such training should highlight how to better align their language to citizens' lived experiences. They also wanted their organisations to provide more space, flexibility and resources to build relationships with citizens in order to provide improved communication and accessibility to citizens.
Conclusion: The difference in priorities between citizens and professionals highlights the importance of involving citizens in policymaking. Moreover, citizens' involvement can act as a lever for change to bring a wider range of services and policy sectors together and has the potential to better align policies to citizens' lived experiences and hopefully increase the democratic legitimacy of policymaking. However, to fulfil such potential municipalities will need to invest in improving their accessibility and communication with communities.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- Nabatchi T., Blomgren-Amsler L. “Direct Public Engagement in Local Government”. American Review of Public Administration. 2014: 1–26.
-
- Lewis S., Bambra C., Barnes A., et al. “Reframing ‘participation’ and ‘inclusion’ in public health policy and practice to address health inequalities: Evidence from a major resident-led neighbourhood improvement initiative”. Health and Social Care in the Community. 2019; 27: 199–206. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12640 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Thomson A.M., Smith-Tolken A.R., Naidoo A.V., et al. “Service Learning and Community Engagement: A Comparison of Three National Contexts”. 2011. Voluntas. 22: 214–237.
-
- Barnes M., Knops A,. Sullivan H. “Recent Research: The micro-politics of deliberation: case studies in public participation.” Contemporary Politics. 2004; 10 (2).
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
